11 Hanover Walk, Blaydon-on-Tyne, NE21 6ES

UPRN:100000003241Semi-Detached Bungalow3 bedsBuilt 1967-1975

LeaseholdCouncil Tax: Band CEPC: C (69)

Data freshness:Price Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 3mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

11 Hanover Walk, Blaydon-on-Tyne, NE21 6ES

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

4 days ago

Verdict: AVOID, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Significant risk factors

Evidence

20 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£185,000

£176k - £195kHigh

Estimate

£185k

Range

£176k – £195k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£1,200

£1k - £1k

Monthly

£1,200

Yield

7.78%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

11 Hanover Walk earns an AVOID rating with HP Score 74/100. Investment score 59/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (50/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

74/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

59/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

12/ 100

Low

Walkability

50/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 28Bike 30

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Reduced confidence2 independent sourcesListing checked 28 Oct 2026

Fewer independent sources agree, or a component could not be scored.

Valuation edge2.5/15
claims [AVM +0.0% (HIGH), sold-comps +16.3%, £/sqft +16.2%] → measured edge +0.50pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 13 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100000003241· as of 13 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 13.9%· as of 12 Oct 2026
Rental economics21.2/40
gross yield 7.8%; range width penalty ×0.95
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1200/mo (range 1150-1300)· as of 13 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -28/mo, -2% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 28 Oct 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 124 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 28 Oct 2026
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
193 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£139,000£212,500

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£185,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£1,200/mo

Evidenced range £1,150-£1,300

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £58,000
Net cash flow: £206/mo
Cash on cash: 4.3%
Score at this price: 38

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.92 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100000003241Valuation edge · as of 13 Oct 2026
property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 13.9%Valuation edge · as of 12 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1200/mo (range 1150-1300)Rental economics · as of 13 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 28 Oct 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 28 Oct 2026

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is reduced
fewer independent sources agree, or a component could not be scored
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 1200/mo (range 1150-1300)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 124 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£185,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£1,200

Gross Yield7.78%

1y Growth-

3y Growth+1.7%

5y Growth+2.7%

10y Growth+2.9%

Last Sold Price£163,000 (2005-06-09)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideModerate
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0NE21 6ES

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

DC/26/00808/TPO
Crown reduce Sycamore by 2m (T1) Remove Beech Tree (T2)
Pending
DC/26/00576/TPO
To remove two low hanging branches of Beech tree located to rear of 9 Spa Well Close.
Pending
DC/26/00478/HHA
Installation of an Air Source Heat Pump
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership57.7%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining35 yrs
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeLeasehold
Last Ownership Change2005-06-09
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

7 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£29,494

Population Density3,673 /km²

Owner Occupied86%

Age Distribution

0-15 11%16-64 55%65+ 34%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

West Lane Primary School
0.1 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.
Parkhead Community Primary School
0.7 mi
Good
St Thomas More Catholic School, Blaydon
0.8 mi
Good
St Joseph's Catholic Primary School, Blaydon
0.9 mi
Good

4 of 15 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

13 Hanover Walk
-
£150k
-
3 Hanover Walk
-
£185k
-
12 Hanover Walk
-
£230k
-
4 Hanover Walk
-
£159k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN