34 Naylor Avenue, Winlaton Mill, Blaydon-on-Tyne, NE21 6SA

UPRN:100000005276-Beds -Built 1900-1929

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band CEPC: D (67)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· freshRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 5mo ago

34 Naylor Avenue, Winlaton Mill, Blaydon-on-Tyne, NE21 6SA

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

17 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£187,000

£169k - £206kMedium

Estimate

£187k

Range

£169k – £206k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

34 Naylor Avenue earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 64/100. Investment score 52/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (24/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

64/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

52/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

11/ 100

Low

Walkability

24/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 6Bike 20

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +14.4% (MEDIUM)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (MEDIUM confidence) · snapshot 10 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100000005276· as of 10 Oct 2026
Risk & liquidity12.9/15
193 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 20%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100000005276Valuation edge · as of 10 Oct 2026
listing_factslisting text signals condition works - budget before trusting any yieldRental economics · as of 4 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
listing text signals condition works - budget before trusting any yield

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
4. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£187,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth+1.7%

5y Growth+2.7%

10y Growth+2.9%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideModerate
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0NE21 6SA

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

DC/26/00576/TPO
To remove two low hanging branches of Beech tree located to rear of 9 Spa Well Close.
Pending
DC/26/00302/HHA
Proposed outbuilding to the front of the property
Pending
DC/25/01146/HHA
First floor side extension over garage and single storey rear extension (orangery)
Approved

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership57.7%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease Type-
Last Ownership Change-
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

5 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£29,494

Population Density1,025 /km²

Owner Occupied64%

Age Distribution

0-15 15%16-64 60%65+ 25%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Parkhead Community Primary School
0.6 mi
Good
West Lane Primary School
0.9 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.
Fellside Community Primary School
1.0 mi
Good
Whickham Parochial Church of England Primary School
1.1 mi
Good

4 of 15 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

38 Naylor Avenue
-
£170k
-
11 Naylor Avenue
-
£200k
-
12 Naylor Avenue
-
£210k
-
6 Naylor Avenue
-
£141k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN