59A Sudbury Court, Allen Edwards Drive, London, SW8 2NT

UPRN:10000442977-Beds -Built -

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band BEPC: -

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· freshAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

59A Sudbury Court, Allen Edwards Drive, London, SW8 2NT

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

today

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

18 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£374,000

£337k - £412kMedium

Estimate

£374k

Range

£337k – £412k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

59A Sudbury Court earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 79/100. Investment score 63/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is excellent (90/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

79/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

63/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

18/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

90/ 100

Excellent

Transit & Bike

Transit 62Bike 75

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM -0.3% (MEDIUM)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (MEDIUM confidence) · snapshot 13 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10000442977· as of 13 Oct 2026
Risk & liquidity12.8/15
268 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 20%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10000442977Valuation edge · as of 13 Oct 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
2. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£374,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth-15.5%

5y Growth-2.2%

10y Growth-1.6%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0SW8 2NT

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/03200/LB
Removal of the existing double doors between the first-floor reception room and kitchen/breakfast room, and infilling of the associated opening including reinstatement of skirting boards to match the existing traditional detailing (Flat 2).
Pending
26/03168/TCA
T1 - Bay Laurel reduce height by 2m from tips and shorten laterals by 1m from tips T2 - Oak reduce laterals over neighbours property by 2m from tips and thin by 15%. T3 - Loquat thin by 15% and shorten laterals by .5m form tips T4 - Gleditisia thin by 15% concentrating on the tips.
Pending
26/03176/P3MA
Prior approval of change of use of Unit 6 at third floor level from office (use class E) to a residential unit (use class C).
Pending

View Planning Timeline