Kings House, 1 Kings Arms Court, Ockley, Dorking, RH5 5BD

UPRN:10000829841Detached House6 bedsBuilt -

FreeholdCouncil Tax: -EPC: C (77)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· 1mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

Kings House, 1 Kings Arms Court, Ockley, Dorking, RH5 5BD

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

5 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

17 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

-- - --

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Kings House earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 57/100. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (16/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageHM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

57/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

No data

Crime Score

9/ 100

Low

Walkability

16/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 9Bike 18

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge2.5/15
claims [sold-comps +38.6%, £/sqft +38.6%] → measured edge +0.50pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp; AVM excluded (no market estimate available)
no market estimate available · snapshot 13 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 3 comps, dispersion 16%· as of 4 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity9/15
103 sales/12mo in area
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 3 comps, dispersion 16%Valuation edge · as of 4 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 5 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Ask the agent why the price was reduced and whether a previous sale fell through.
1 price cut(s) recorded on the listing history.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
4. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate-

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth+0.3%

5y Growth-3.0%

10y Growth+1.6%

Last Sold Price£1,225,000 (2021-09-17)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningLow
LandslideSignificant
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0RH5 5BD

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

MO/2026/01603
Submission of details pursuant to Conditions 3, 4, 5, and 8 of planning permission MO/2025/02212 for the Variation of Condition 2 and Condition 11 and removal of condition 24 of approved planning application MO/2022/0018 for the erection of 23 No. dwellings and formation of new access from Stane Street with associated works to allow the minor adjustments to the layout and dwelling elevations.
Pending
MO/2026/01612
Demolition of existing stables and the erection of 1 No. dwelling with associated parking and landscaping.
Pending
MO/2026/01480
Submission of details pursuant to Condition 14 of planning permission MO/2023/0331/PLA for the erection of three 3-bed dwelling houses. Demolition of outbuilding. Provision of new car park to rear of The Cricketers Arms.
Conditions

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership67.8%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeFreehold
Last Ownership Change2021-09-17
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

8 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£35,341

Population Density68 /km²

Owner Occupied75%

Age Distribution

0-15 18%16-64 60%65+ 22%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

The Weald CofE Primary School
2.5 mi
Good
Leith Hill School
3.2 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.
Newdigate CofE Endowed Aided Infant School
3.2 mi
Good
Hurtwood House School
3.2 mi
Inspected by ISI

2 of 11 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

2 Kings Arms Court
-
£515k
-
4 Kings Arms Court
-
£490k
-
3 Kings Arms Court
-
£425k
-
1 Kings Arms Court
-
£1.23M
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN