101 Capenhurst Lane, Whitby, Ellesmere Port, CH65 7AQ

UPRN:100010106726-Beds -Built 1967-1975

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band CEPC: D (63)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· 1mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 4mo ago

101 Capenhurst Lane, Whitby, Ellesmere Port, CH65 7AQ

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

5 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£175,000

£140k - £210kLow

Estimate

£175k

Range

£140k – £210k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

101 Capenhurst Lane earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 76/100. Investment score 58/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is good (71/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

76/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

58/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

22/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

71/ 100

High

Transit & Bike

Transit 23Bike 41

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires valuation_edge (estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor)
headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Risk & liquidity9.2/15
274 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 40%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 5 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Valuation edge could not be scored
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available

Plan

Before you offer

1. Fill the valuation edge gap before relying on the score.
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
2. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
3. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£175,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth+61.4%

3y Growth-2.4%

5y Growth+2.5%

10y Growth+3.5%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0CH65 7AQ

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/03455/TPO
Pruning of four lateral overhanging branches back to the property boundary line circa 5 metres to alleviate physical obstruction of the garden/structure, while maintaining the overall health, structural balance, and natural form of the tree. Cuts will be made to appropriate growth points in accordance with good arboricultural practice
Pending
26/03299/ADV
Installation of an illuminated neon THEATRE sign above the new Theatre Porto building.
Pending
26/03291/TPO
Carry out selective pruning to three sections of the trees along the rear boundary of the property. T1 Oak, right-hand side - Prune back the specified overhanging branch to suitable growth points, providing improved clearance from the boundary. T2 Sycamore, left-hand side - Selectively prune back the specified section of canopy to suitable growth points, reducing the lateral spread towards the property. T3 Oak - Prune back the specified lower limb to suitable growth points to provide additional clearance. Works limited to the three sections rather than a general reduction of the trees.
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership51.9%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease Type-
Last Ownership Change-
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

4 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£32,391

Population Density-

Owner Occupied79%

Age Distribution

0-15 20%16-64 61%65+ 19%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Hinderton School
0.1 mi
Outstanding
The Bridge Short Stay School
0.1 mi
Good
Ellesmere Port Catholic High School, a Voluntary Academy
0.2 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.
Our Lady Star of the Sea Catholic Primary School
0.3 mi
Good

0 of 12 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

99 Capenhurst Lane
-
£265k
-
55 Capenhurst Lane
-
£185k
-
29 Capenhurst Lane
-
£248k
-
91 Capenhurst Lane
-
£115k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN