23 Cedar Avenue, Little Sutton, Ellesmere Port, CH66 3QX

UPRN:100010107073End Terrace House3 bedsBuilt 1930-1949

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band AEPC: D (63)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 3mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 4mo ago

23 Cedar Avenue, Little Sutton, Ellesmere Port, CH66 3QX

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

6 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

18 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£164,000

£156k - £173kHigh

Estimate

£164k

Range

£156k – £173k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£1,150

£1k - £1k

Monthly

£1,150

Yield

8.36%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

23 Cedar Avenue earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 75/100. Investment score 64/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (51/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

75/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

64/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

10/ 100

Low

Walkability

51/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 33Bike 50

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

High confidence3 independent sourcesListing checked 2 Nov 2026

Every component scored, and three or more independent sources agree.

Valuation edge2.5/15
claims [AVM -0.6% (HIGH), sold-comps +13.6%, £/sqft +13.4%] → measured edge +0.50pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 12 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100010107073· as of 12 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 23.6%· as of 31 Oct 2026
Rental economics25.3/40
gross yield 8.4%; range width penalty ×0.94
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1150/mo (range 1050-1200)· as of 12 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin1.7/30
stressed cash flow +19/mo, +2% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); passes the stress
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 2 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 30 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 2 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
378 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivityScores 70+ up to £128,000

£124,000£189,500

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£165,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£1,150/mo

Evidenced range £1,050-£1,200

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £51,600
Net cash flow: £239/mo
Cash on cash: 5.6%
Score at this price: 44

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 2.07 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100010107073Valuation edge · as of 12 Oct 2026
property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 23.6%Valuation edge · as of 31 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1150/mo (range 1050-1200)Rental economics · as of 12 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 2 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 2 Nov 2026

Risks

What could kill this deal

Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 1150/mo (range 1050-1200)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 30 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →flood, subsidence, crime, environment - the full domain

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Set your walk-away price before viewing - above £128,000 the deal stops scoring well.
Computed by re-running the score at higher prices.
3. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£164,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£1,150

Gross Yield8.36%

1y Growth-

3y Growth+2.4%

5y Growth+3.2%

10y Growth+4.2%

Last Sold Price£135,000 (2021-04-16)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0CH66 3QX

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/03145/FUL
Single storey side extension to create an additional public bar room
Pending
26/02950/FUL
Retrospective change of use of part of the dwellinghouse to a mixed residential and commercial use comprising an appointment-only clinic providing aesthetic, skin and healthcare services, with one treatment room, associated entrance/consultation area and ancillary office/storage space
Pending
26/02926/FUL
Full planning application for the permanent retention of all existing structures including polytunnels, cafe/office building, classrooms, ancillary structures and use of land for the continued charity/community horticultural use as well as wider non-horticultural charity/ community use of buildings and land.
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership67.5%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeFreehold
Last Ownership Change2021-04-16
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

17 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£32,391

Population Density6,153 /km²

Owner Occupied59%

Age Distribution

0-15 19%16-64 63%65+ 18%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Sutton Green Primary School
0.2 mi
Good
Parklands Community Primary and Nursery School
0.2 mi
Good
St Mary of The Angels Catholic Primary School, A Voluntary Academy
0.3 mi
Inspected as St Mary of the Angels Catholic Primary School (URN 111357) on 19 Nov 2024
Rossmore School
0.4 mi
Good

4 of 12 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

23 Cedar Avenue
-
£135k
-
43 Cedar Avenue
-
£106k
-
31 Cedar Avenue
-
£130k
-
37 Cedar Avenue
-
£120k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN