77 Blackburn Road, Great Harwood, Blackburn, BB6 7DZ

UPRN:100010446039Mid Terrace House3 bedsBuilt before 1900

LeaseholdCouncil Tax: Band AEPC: C (70)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· freshEPC· 4mo agoRisk· 5mo agoCrime· freshConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 1mo ago

77 Blackburn Road, Great Harwood, Blackburn, BB6 7DZ

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

20 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£80,000

£76k - £84kHigh

Estimate

£80k

Range

£76k – £84k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£550

£500 - £600

Monthly

£550

Yield

8.25%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

77 Blackburn Road earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 76/100. Investment score 63/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is excellent (86/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

76/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

63/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

24/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

86/ 100

Excellent

Transit & Bike

Transit 24Bike 50

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence1 independent sourceListing checked 4 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +0.0% (HIGH)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 9 Nov 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100010446039· as of 9 Nov 2026
Rental economics21.7/40
gross yield 8.2%; range width penalty ×0.84
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 550/mo (range 500-600)· as of 9 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
- listing_factslisting text signals condition works - budget before trusting any yield· as of 4 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -63/mo, -12% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 4 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 341 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 4 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
216 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£60,000£92,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£80,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£550/mo

Evidenced range £500-£600

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £25,300
Net cash flow: £111/mo
Cash on cash: 5.3%
Score at this price: 36

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 2.04 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100010446039Valuation edge · as of 9 Nov 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 550/mo (range 500-600)Rental economics · as of 9 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
listing_factslisting text signals condition works - budget before trusting any yieldRental economics · as of 4 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 4 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 550/mo (range 500-600)
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
listing text signals condition works - budget before trusting any yield

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£80,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£550

Gross Yield8.25%

1y Growth-74.3%

3y Growth-3.9%

5y Growth-1.6%

10y Growth+0.3%

Last Sold Price£40,000 (2004-01-19)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonLow
MiningLow
LandslideModerate
Air QualityLow
NoiseHigh

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0BB6 7DZ

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

11/26/0483
Works to TPO: 1997 No.5 (W1) - Sycamore - removal of low overhanging branch, 1.5m crown reduction, 3.5m-4m crown lift, crown thinning of no more than 10%, removal of deadwood and epicormic growth
Pending
11/26/0472
Householder: Erection of single storey rear extension
Pending
11/26/0471
Full: Replacement of 10No. UPVC Windows to north and west elevations, including 2No. aluminum framed fire rated window to improve existing first floor escape provision
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership49.5%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining834 yrs
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeLeasehold
Last Ownership Change2004-01-19
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

19 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£29,647

Population Density14,120 /km²

Owner Occupied59%

Age Distribution

0-15 24%16-64 65%65+ 11%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Great Harwood Primary School
0.1 mi
Good
St Wulstan's Roman Catholic Primary School, Great Harwood
0.1 mi
Good
Great Harwood St John's Church of England Primary School
0.2 mi
Good
Great Harwood St Bartholomew's Parish Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School
0.4 mi
Good

2 of 13 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

110 Blackburn Road
-
£61k
-
113 Blackburn Road
-
£70k
-
87 Blackburn Road
-
£77k
-
114 Blackburn Road
-
£80k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN