10 Chestnut Villas, 53 Crescent Park, Stockport, SK4 2JD

UPRN:100012479754Flat/MaisonetteBeds -Built 1967-1975

Tenure: -Council Tax: -EPC: C (75)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

10 Chestnut Villas, 53 Crescent Park, Stockport, SK4 2JD

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

3 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£176,000

£159k - £194kMedium

Estimate

£176k

Range

£159k – £194k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£750

£700 - £800

Monthly

£750

Yield

5.45%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

10 Chestnut Villas earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 72/100. Investment score 54/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Walkability is limited (69/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

72/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

54/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

No data

Walkability

69/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 16Bike 48

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesLead to verifyListing checked 5 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Check before relying on this score: leasehold with no service charge disclosed - the stress test assumes GBP 0. It ranks after every home whose inputs are verified.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +6.2% (MEDIUM)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (MEDIUM confidence) · snapshot 13 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100012479754· as of 13 Oct 2026
Rental economics3.4/40
gross yield 5.5%; range width penalty ×0.93
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 750/mo (range 700-800)· as of 13 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -275/mo, -37% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing; leasehold with no service charge disclosed - the stress assumes GBP 0
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 5 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 59 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 5 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity12.9/15
388 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 20%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£124,000£189,500

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£165,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£750/mo

Evidenced range £700-£800

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £51,600
Net cash flow: -£38/mo
Cash on cash: -0.9%
Score at this price: 16

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.35 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100012479754Valuation edge · as of 13 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 750/mo (range 700-800)Rental economics · as of 13 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 5 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 5 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 750/mo (range 700-800)
Stress margin needs verification before you rely on it
costs not disclosed by the advert

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£176,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£750

Gross Yield5.45%

1y Growth-

3y Growth+1.1%

5y Growth+1.2%

10y Growth+3.1%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0SK4 2JD

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

DC/100534
Application to vary condition 1 attached to planning permission DC/079227 to allow for substitution of the approved site and landscape plans
Pending
DC/100456
installation of new rear dormer with associated internal works, including dropping of existing ceilings.
Pending
DC/100420
T23 Sycamore tree. Proposal to remove x1 lower branch growing towards oak tree and reduce lower overhanging canopy by no more the 1.5 metres from branch tips, bring lower canopy in to match main canopy line. T24 oak tree. Crown lift lower canopy to 5 metres, reduce lower canopy growing towards property by no more than 2metres from branch tips. Lower canopy to be pruned in to match main canopy line. T25 oak tree. Cut back x3 lower branches inline with boundary fence. All works to be carried out to BS3998 standard. TPO 365W.
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership54%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining245 yrs
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease Type-
Last Ownership Change-
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

9 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£33,565

Population Density2,874 /km²

Owner Occupied81%

Age Distribution

0-15 20%16-64 62%65+ 18%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Norris Bank Primary School
0.2 mi
Inspected as Norris Bank Primary School (URN 106065) on 24 Jul 2024
Brinksway School
0.4 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.
Mersey Vale Primary School
0.5 mi
Good
Lark Hill Primary School
0.6 mi
Good

2 of 9 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

49E Crescent Park
-
£170k
-
49G Crescent Park
-
£178k
-
Chestnut Villas, 53 Crescent Park
-
£95k
-
47H Crescent Park
-
£150k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN