81 Teddington Park, Teddington, TW11 8DE

UPRN:100022326861-Beds -Built -

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band GEPC: -

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· 1mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 6mo ago

81 Teddington Park, Teddington, TW11 8DE

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

5 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

17 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£1,754,000

£1.58M - £1.93MMedium

Estimate

£1.75M

Range

£1.58M – £1.93M

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

81 Teddington Park earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 81/100. Investment score 62/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is good (83/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

81/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

62/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

12/ 100

Low

Walkability

83/ 100

High

Transit & Bike

Transit 37Bike 73

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +8.8% (MEDIUM)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (MEDIUM confidence) · snapshot 10 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100022326861· as of 10 Oct 2026
Risk & liquidity12.8/15
251 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 20%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100022326861Valuation edge · as of 10 Oct 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
2. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
3. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£1,754,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth-2.9%

5y Growth+1.5%

10y Growth+2.0%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0TW11 8DE

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

PA26/3761
T2 Copper Beech (Fagus sylvatica purpurea) Crown reduce by approximately 1-1.5m back to most recent previous reduction points, to tidy and contain. Final heights 8m and final spreads 6m.
Pending
PA26/3748
REAR GARDEN T1 (closest to wall) Palm Cabbage (Cordyline australis) - Fell to ground level astree is dead.
Pending
PA26/3740
English yew (Taxus baccata) identified as T003 on the accompanying tree survey and classified as Category B. As recommended by our tree surgeon, we propose a crown reduction of approximately 1–2 metres across the entire tree including branches overhanging the neighbouring property to reduce its overall size while maintaining its natural shape. Our property is within a conservation area. We have been unable to establish whether the tree is also subject to a Tree Preservation Order (TPO). As the form does not offer an 'Unknown' option we have selected 'No' but would be grateful if the Council could confirm its TPO status and process the application accordingly.
Pending

View Planning Timeline