Skip to property details

25 Swaby Road, London, SW18 3PX

UPRN:100022699062Mid Terrace House3 bedsBuilt 1930-1949
FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band DEPC: C (70)
Data freshness:Listing· freshListing: fresh, refreshed 4d ago (2026-11-11T04:00:09.660235+00:00)Planning· 4mo agoPlanning: stale, refreshed 4mo ago (2026-07-10T08:22:21.826707+00:00)Ownership· freshOwnership: fresh, refreshed 4d ago (2026-11-10T13:32:43.821582+00:00)EPC· 1mo agoEPC: ageing, refreshed 1mo ago (2026-10-01T13:05:34.195781+00:00)Risk· 5mo agoRisk: stale, refreshed 5mo ago (2026-06-18T00:00:00+00:00)Crime· freshCrime: fresh, refreshed 3d ago (2026-11-11T13:01:03.839912+00:00)Connectivity· 1mo agoConnectivity: ageing, refreshed 1mo ago (2026-10-03T06:43:10.905825+00:00)Amenities· 2mo agoAmenities: ageing, refreshed 2mo ago (2026-09-23T00:00:00+00:00)Area· Census 2021Area: static reference data (Census 2021); authoritative and does not refreshCouncil Tax· 6mo agoCouncil Tax: stale, refreshed 6mo ago (2026-05-20T09:33:12.870431+00:00)
25 Swaby Road, London, SW18 3PX

HP Score

Strong
Verdict
today
  • Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.

    Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence
18 of 21 sources
Sale Estimate
£1,041,000
£989k - £1.09MHigh
Estimate
£1.04M
Range
£989k – £1.09M
Rent Estimate (pcm)
£4,100
£4k - £5k
Monthly
£4,100
Yield
5.18%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

25 Swaby Road earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 83/100. Investment score 63/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is excellent (89/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS
HP Score
83/ 100
Strong
Investment Score
63/ 100
Moderate
Crime Score
9/ 100
Low
Walkability
89/ 100
Excellent
Transit & Bike
Transit 35Bike 69
Walk Score, out of 100

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£1,041,000
Rent Estimate (pcm)£4,100
Gross Yield5.18%
1y Growth-
3y Growth-0.2%
5y Growth+0.2%
10y Growth+0.0%
Last Sold Price£460,000 (2007-03-30)

Risk Overview

  • Flood RiskUnknown
  • SubsidenceSignificant
  • RadonLow
  • MiningUnknown
  • LandslideLow
  • Air QualityLow
  • NoiseLow

Planning Activity

Recent Apps
0SW18 3PX
Approval Rate
-12mo
Development
low
  • PA2026/0669
    T1 Sycamore: Fell to ground level / Section dismantle T1 is a large sycamore in a small rear garden, close to the boundary and neighbouring dwelling. It has outgrown its location, and its size, position and continued development are increasingly incompatible with the available space and the reasonable use and enjoyment of the adjoining property. The crown extends significantly over the neighbouring garden and dwelling, causing concerns about encroachment, potential contact with the roof, obstructed gutters, excessive shading, and nuisance from leaf and seed fall. The main stem is immediately adjacent to the boundary fence and already interfering with it, making fence maintenance or replacement impractical without addressing the tree. The tree has not yet reached full size. Sycamore is a vigorous, large-growing species capable of exceeding 20 metres with a substantial spreading crown. As it matures, its crown spread, stem diameter and spatial conflicts will inevitably increase. Pruning has been considered as an alternative, but there is no satisfactory long-term solution. Substantial crown reduction would be needed to achieve meaningful clearance from the neighbouring property, significantly altering the tree’s natural form and appearance. Sycamore also responds vigorously to heavy pruning, with rapid regrowth requiring frequent repeat work. This would create ongoing maintenance without addressing the tree’s unsuitable position. In terms of public amenity, the tree is in a rear garden and cannot be seen from the main road. Although partly visible from Openview, its contribution to the wider public landscape is limited when weighed against its constrained location and ongoing conflicts with neighbouring properties. Its removal would have limited impact on the character and appearance of the area. The proposal does not intend a permanent loss of tree cover. The owner has confirmed willingness to plant a smaller, more appropriate replacement species in a suitable location, able to reach maturity without similar conflicts with buildings, boundaries or residential amenity, while maintaining the garden’s contribution to local greenery and biodiversity. Conclusion Considering the tree’s size relative to its restricted growing space, its encroachment over the neighbouring dwelling and garden, its direct conflict with the boundary fence, its potential for further growth and the lack of a satisfactory long-term pruning option, removal is considered the most appropriate and sustainable arboricultural solution. The replacement planting would ensure continuity of tree cover and a more suitable long-term contribution to the landscape. On balance, the practical and residential benefits of removal, with the replacement planting commitment, outweigh the limited loss of public amenity. Accordingly, consent is respectfully sought for the removal of T1 sycamore, subject to appropriate replacement planting within the garden.
    Pending
  • PA2026/0591
    Notification of amendment to approved affordable housing provider for phase 7 pursuant to reserved matters permission dated 26/4/2023 reference: 2022/4812, as amended under application ref. 2023/2851 dated 25/10/2023, further to Schedule 1 part 1 para 2.1 of S106 agreement pursuant to outline planning permission ref. 2010/3703 (Redevelopment of Springfield Hospital site entailing the erection of 25,000 sq.m replacement mental health facilities (Use Class C2/C2A); 839 residential dwellings (including up to 262 dwellings within the converted Main Building and Elizabeth Newton Wing and 56 extra care residential apartments) (Use Class C3); 9,200 sq.m elderly persons' care home (including up to 50 close care units) (Use Class C2); 240 sq.m of retail floorspace (Use Class A1); a school Use Class (D1); 3,500 sq.m of flexible non-residential floor space, Use Class A1(up to 160 sq.m), A2 (up to 200 sq.m), A3 (up to 300 sq.m), A4 (up to 250 sq.m), B1 (up to 200 sq.m), D1 (up to 1195 sq.m), or D2 (up to 1195 sq.m)); landscaped public park; other private and public open space; construction of a combined cooling, heat and power energy centre; associated landscaping, parking, roads, access and infrastructure and other associated works. (Outline application with appearance, landscaping and scale reserved), as amended under applications ref. 2014/6585, 2016/4760 and 2019/2495.
    Conditions
  • PA2026/0579
    Cherry Tree to fell. The cherry tree is situated within the rear garden of 119 Magdalen Road. The tree is mature and showing signs of decline, including areas of deadwood within the crown. This gives rise to reasonable concerns regarding branch failure and safety, particularly given the garden’s use by a child. The tree has also been subject to significant historical pruning and has subsequently failed to recover satisfactorily. Given the tree’s condition and limited prospects for recovery, removal is considered appropriate. A suitable replacement specimen will be planted.
    Approved

Ownership

  • Corporate Ownership52%
  • Overseas OwnershipNo
  • Lease Term Remaining-
  • CovenantsRestrictive
  • Lease TypeFreehold
  • Last Ownership Change2007-03-30
  • SourceLand Registry

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)
3 Mbps
Mobile 4G/5G Coverage
EEThreeO2Vodafone
EV Charger
-
PTAL Rating
-

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£49,310
Population Density-
Owner Occupied69%
Age Distribution
0-15 24%16-64 67%65+ 9%

Schools Nearby

  • Earlsfield Primary School
    0.1 mi
    Outstanding
  • Chelsea Hall School
    0.1 mi
    Inspected by ISI
  • Beatrix Potter Primary School
    0.2 mi
    Good
  • Tram House School
    0.3 mi
    Outstanding

4 of 9 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

Comparables

View All
  • 21 Swaby Road
    -
    £950k
    -
  • 11 Swaby Road
    -
    £925k
    -
  • 29 Swaby Road
    -
    £640k
    -
  • 21 Swaby Road
    -
    £748k
    -