1 Lauderdale Mansions, Lauderdale Road, London, W9 1LX

UPRN:100022772484Converted Flat3 bedsBuilt 1900-1929

LeaseholdCouncil Tax: Band FEPC: C (74)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· freshEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoCrime· freshConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 1mo ago

1 Lauderdale Mansions, Lauderdale Road, London, W9 1LX

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

today

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

20 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£1,104,000

£993k - £1.21MMedium

Estimate

£1.10M

Range

£993k – £1.21M

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£4,750

£4k - £5k

Monthly

£4,750

Yield

3.68%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

1 Lauderdale Mansions earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 86/100. Investment score 70/100 reflects strong fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is excellent (93/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

86/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

70/ 100

High

Crime Score

16/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

93/ 100

Excellent

Transit & Bike

Transit 46Bike 75

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

listing is 'Sold subject to contract' - sale already progressing, not an actionable opportunity

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Economics

What happens to your money

Your assumptions

Purchase price£1,550,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£4,750/mo

Evidenced range £4,250-£5,200

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £566,050
Net cash flow: -£1,943/mo
Cash on cash: -4.1%
Score at this price: -

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 0.91 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion

Property risk deep-dive →flood, subsidence, crime, environment - the full domain

Plan

Before you offer

1. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£1,104,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£4,750

Gross Yield3.68%

1y Growth+15.8%

3y Growth-4.5%

5y Growth-0.6%

10y Growth-0.3%

Last Sold Price£1,200,000 (2024-04-24)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

1W9 1LX

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/07502/FULL
Installation of two air conditioning condenser units at main roof level, with associated anti-vibration mounts and external refrigerant trunking to the rear elevation.
Pending
26/07484/TCA
T3 ? Sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus), located in the rear garden of 208 Randolph Avenue, London W9 1PF. Proposed works: Fell T3 Sycamore to ground level and remove the resulting timber and arisings. The tree has been classified as Category U in the Arboricultural Implications Assessment (Report J69.34, dated 12 October 2026) prepared by Broad Oak Tree Consultants. The assessment identifies significant basal decay, a basal cavity, structural deterioration and crown dieback. The report recommends pollarding at approximately 8 metres or felling. Full removal is proposed due to the tree's poor structural condition and associated safety concerns.
Pending
26/07480/FULL
Minor alterations to fenestration in support of internal remodelling.
Pending

View Planning Timeline