Skip to property details

3 Hickling Road, Nottingham, NG3 6GU

UPRN:100031363890Detached House3 bedsBuilt 1950-1966
FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band DEPC: D (64)
Data freshness:Listing· 8mo agoListing: stale, refreshed 8mo ago (2026-03-19T13:52:17.943725+00:00)Ownership· freshOwnership: fresh, refreshed 3d ago (2026-11-10T13:55:18.738928+00:00)EPC· 5mo agoEPC: stale, refreshed 5mo ago (2026-07-01T02:04:50.057738+00:00)Risk· 5mo agoRisk: stale, refreshed 5mo ago (2026-06-18T00:00:00+00:00)Crime· freshCrime: fresh, refreshed 2d ago (2026-11-11T13:01:03.839912+00:00)Connectivity· 1mo agoConnectivity: ageing, refreshed 1mo ago (2026-10-03T06:43:10.905825+00:00)Schools· 1mo agoSchools: ageing, refreshed 1mo ago (2026-10-06T05:00:30.533230+00:00)Amenities· 2mo agoAmenities: ageing, refreshed 2mo ago (2026-09-23T00:00:00+00:00)Area· Census 2021Area: static reference data (Census 2021); authoritative and does not refreshCouncil Tax· 5mo agoCouncil Tax: stale, refreshed 5mo ago (2026-06-09T05:46:13.791441+00:00)
3 Hickling Road, Nottingham, NG3 6GU

HP Score

Mixed
Verdict
2 days ago
  • Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.

    Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence
18 of 21 sources
Sale Estimate
£324,000
£307k - £340kHigh
Estimate
£324k
Range
£307k – £340k
Rent Estimate (pcm)
£1,800
£2k - £2k
Monthly
£1,800
Yield
6.67%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

3 Hickling Road earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 74/100. Investment score 46/100 reflects below-average fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (61/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS
HP Score
74/ 100
Mixed
Investment Score
46/ 100
Mixed
Crime Score
6/ 100
Low
Walkability
61/ 100
Moderate
Transit & Bike
Transit 28Bike 53
Walk Score, out of 100

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£324,000
Rent Estimate (pcm)£1,800
Gross Yield6.67%
1y Growth-53.5%
3y Growth+2.6%
5y Growth+1.5%
10y Growth+4.7%
Last Sold Price-

Risk Overview

  • Flood RiskUnknown
  • SubsidenceLow
  • RadonLow
  • MiningUnknown
  • LandslideModerate
  • Air QualityLow
  • NoiseLow

Planning Activity

Recent Apps
1NG3 6GU
Approval Rate
-12mo
Development
low
  • 26/01921/PWC
    T22-27 - cherry - Crown lift to 3m over path T42 - Norway Maple - sever ivy T43 - Sycamore - sever ivy T54 - Sycamore - Reduce crown by 2-3m T1 - Crab Apple - Crown lift to 3m, Remove Deadwood T2 - Crab Apple - Crown lift to 3m, Remove Deadwood T3 - Turkish Hazel - Crown Reduce by 2m (additional to report) - to reduce height to below apartment window
    Pending
  • 26/01926/5DAY
    Removal of fallen tree only.
    Pending
  • 26/01864/PTPO
    The proposed works relate to T1 and T2 only, both mature beech trees (Fagus sylvatica) protected under TPO1048. Proposed works ? T1 and T2 Undertake selective lateral crown reduction to the building-facing aspects of both trees, targeting branches extending towards and overhanging the adjacent property. The objective is to establish approximately 2.5?3.0 metres of lateral clearance from the building, reducing affected branches back to the nearest suitable pruning points whilst retaining as much of the existing crown structure as practicable. The attached photographs illustrate the existing encroachment and the approximate proposed pruning limits, with the red lines indicating the intended extent of reduction. Justification The works are proposed in response to a neighbouring property complaint concerning branches encroaching upon the building, including reported contact with the roof and windows with the risk of damage. Given the maturity and protected status of these trees, I believe a limited and sympathetic intervention is the most appropriate approach. There is no justification for a wholesale crown reduction or removal of otherwise unaffected branches. The intention is simply to provide reasonable separation between the trees and the building, reducing the likelihood of continued contact and potential damage whilst preserving their natural form, structural integrity and considerable amenity value. The proposed 2.5?3.0m clearance will be achieved wherever suitable pruning points permit, without compromising the long-term health or structural integrity of either tree.
    Pending

Ownership

  • Corporate Ownership72.8%
  • Overseas OwnershipNo
  • Lease Term Remaining-
  • CovenantsRestrictive
  • Lease TypeFreehold
  • Last Ownership Change-
  • SourceLand Registry

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)
4 Mbps
Mobile 4G/5G Coverage
EEThreeO2Vodafone
EV Charger
-
PTAL Rating
-

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£30,051
Population Density-
Owner Occupied81%
Age Distribution
0-15 17%16-64 66%65+ 17%

Schools Nearby

  • The Wells Academy
    0.3 mi
    Report card2026

    Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.

  • Walter Halls Primary and Early Years School
    0.3 mi
    -
  • Porchester Junior School
    0.4 mi
    Report card2026

    Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.

  • Thorneywood Education Base
    0.5 mi
    -

4 of 11 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

Comparables

View All
  • 1C Hickling Road
    -
    £86k
    -
  • 10 Hickling Road
    -
    £185k
    -
  • 1D Hickling Road
    -
    £89k
    -
  • 11 Hickling Road
    -
    £230k
    -