17 The Vineyard, Bouldnor, Yarmouth, PO41 0XE

UPRN:10003315564Detached BungalowBeds -Built 1983-1990

LeaseholdCouncil Tax: Band CEPC: D (65)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

17 The Vineyard, Bouldnor, Yarmouth, PO41 0XE

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

2 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

20 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£294,000

£264k - £323kMedium

Estimate

£294k

Range

£264k – £323k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£800

£700 - £900

Monthly

£800

Yield

5.82%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

17 The Vineyard earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 60/100. Investment score 59/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (7/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

60/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

59/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

11/ 100

Low

Walkability

7/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 7Bike 22

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

listing is 'Sold subject to contract' - sale already progressing, not an actionable opportunity

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Economics

What happens to your money

Your assumptions

Purchase price£165,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£800/mo

Evidenced range £700-£900

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £51,600
Net cash flow: -£3/mo
Cash on cash: -0.1%
Score at this price: -

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.44 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion

Property risk deep-dive →flood, subsidence, crime, environment - the full domain

Plan

Before you offer

1. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£294,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£800

Gross Yield5.82%

1y Growth-

3y Growth+8.7%

5y Growth+2.1%

10y Growth+2.4%

Last Sold Price£76,500 (1999-03-02)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0PO41 0XE

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/01079/TW
Remove trees, weeds and scrub below 1m in height along boundary with woodland TPO (Kleffen House).
Approved
26/01046/HOU
Replenishment of/addition of boulders forward of sea wall and addition of gabion baskets to improve existing sea defences
Pending
26/00957/TW
Amendment to proposal: T1; Conifer - Remove the south-facing codominant lateral stem in its entirety, back to its point of origin on the main stem; Carry out an additional reduction to the tips of selected branches by approximately 1.5 metres; Make pruning cuts back to suitable growth points in accordance with good arboricultural practice. Reason: The lateral stem has formed a weak codominant union and carries significant lateral and end weight. This creates an increased risk of structural failure and the stem tearing out, particularly during periods of high wind. Pruning to be undertaken to maintain the overall balance and proportion of the remaining stem and crown. T2; Lime Tree - Remove close to ground level. Reason: The tree has developed a pronounced lean, resulting in significant asymmetric loading through the main stem and root plate. The base displays substantial adaptive growth, including a visibly enlarged and bulging root system, suggesting the tree has been responding to prolonged structural loading. Due to the extent of the lean and the continued loading placed upon the stem base and root plate; removal is proposed to prevent the tree becoming an increased structural concern as it continues to mature.
Approved

View Planning Timeline