Belmont Hotel, 8 Queens Road, Shanklin, PO37 6AN

UPRN:10003319416-Beds -Built -

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band AEPC: -

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 1mo agoOwnership· freshRisk· 5mo agoCrime· freshConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 1mo ago

Belmont Hotel, 8 Queens Road, Shanklin, PO37 6AN

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

3 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

17 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

-- - --

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Belmont Hotel earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 71/100. Crime intensity is moderate. Walkability is good (71/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

71/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

No data

Crime Score

47/ 100

Elevated

Walkability

71/ 100

High

Transit & Bike

Transit 26Bike 57

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires valuation_edge (no market estimate available)
headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Risk & liquidity9/15
111 sales/12mo in area
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 12 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Valuation edge could not be scored
no market estimate available
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available

Plan

Before you offer

1. Fill the valuation edge gap before relying on the score.
no market estimate available
2. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
3. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate-

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth-0.7%

5y Growth-2.3%

10y Growth+3.0%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideSignificant
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

1PO37 6AN

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/01571/TW
T1; Leylandii - Fell. Reason: Cracked fencing and roots lifted previous pavement prior to it being resurfaced. Applicant would like to prevent any further damage to property.
Pending
26/01537/LBC
Listed Building Consent for proposed refurbishment of staff mess/toilets
Pending
26/01524/TW
T1; Oak - Reduce crown all over by 1/1.5m; Raise crown over carpark to 4.5m above ground level. T2; Holm oak - Reduce crown all over by 1.5m; Raise crown to 5.5m above ground level to clear container. T3; Sycamore - Reduce crown all over by 1.5m; Raise crown to 4.5m above ground level over carpark. G2; Group of broadleaves - Raise to 4.5m above ground level over carpark; Reduce canopy all over by 1/1.5m; Remove the elm to near ground level, this has no amenity value and is impeding carpark. G1; Sycamores - Reduce crown by all over 1m - Raise to 4.5m above ground level over carpark. Reason: All works to reduce sail area and leverage on the bank, also to provide clearance of parking area.
Pending

View Planning Timeline