15 Waters Edge, Bouldnor, Yarmouth, PO41 0XB

UPRN:10003325554Detached House4 bedsBuilt 1996-2002

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band FEPC: D (68)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· freshEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

15 Waters Edge, Bouldnor, Yarmouth, PO41 0XB

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

3 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

18 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£683,000

£649k - £717kHigh

Estimate

£683k

Range

£649k – £717k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£1,900

£2k - £2k

Monthly

£1,900

Yield

2.68%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

15 Waters Edge earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 60/100. Investment score 59/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (5/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

60/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

59/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

11/ 100

Low

Walkability

5/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 6Bike 22

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesListing checked 4 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge-1.6/15
claims [AVM -24.5% (HIGH)] → measured edge -0.33pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp; asking more than 10% above the estimate (measured -0.33pp)
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 13 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10003325554· as of 13 Oct 2026
Rental economics0/40
gross yield 2.7%; range width penalty ×0.67
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1900/mo (range 1650-2150)· as of 13 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -2,319/mo, -122% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 4 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 1 price cut(s), 157 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 4 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.3/15
24 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£637,500£977,500

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£850,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£1,900/mo

Evidenced range £1,650-£2,150

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £288,800
Net cash flow: -£1,553/mo
Cash on cash: -6.5%
Score at this price: 13

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 0.66 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10003325554Valuation edge · as of 13 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1900/mo (range 1650-2150)Rental economics · as of 13 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 4 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 1900/mo (range 1650-2150)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 1 price cut(s), 157 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Ask the agent why the price was reduced and whether a previous sale fell through.
1 price cut(s) recorded on the listing history.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£683,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£1,900

Gross Yield2.68%

1y Growth-

3y Growth+8.7%

5y Growth+2.1%

10y Growth+2.4%

Last Sold Price£745,000 (2022-07-29)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseBelow 40 dB

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0PO41 0XB

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/01079/TW
Remove trees, weeds and scrub below 1m in height along boundary with woodland TPO (Kleffen House).
Approved
26/01046/HOU
Replenishment of/addition of boulders forward of sea wall and addition of gabion baskets to improve existing sea defences
Pending
26/00957/TW
Amendment to proposal: T1; Conifer - Remove the south-facing codominant lateral stem in its entirety, back to its point of origin on the main stem; Carry out an additional reduction to the tips of selected branches by approximately 1.5 metres; Make pruning cuts back to suitable growth points in accordance with good arboricultural practice. Reason: The lateral stem has formed a weak codominant union and carries significant lateral and end weight. This creates an increased risk of structural failure and the stem tearing out, particularly during periods of high wind. Pruning to be undertaken to maintain the overall balance and proportion of the remaining stem and crown. T2; Lime Tree - Remove close to ground level. Reason: The tree has developed a pronounced lean, resulting in significant asymmetric loading through the main stem and root plate. The base displays substantial adaptive growth, including a visibly enlarged and bulging root system, suggesting the tree has been responding to prolonged structural loading. Due to the extent of the lean and the continued loading placed upon the stem base and root plate; removal is proposed to prevent the tree becoming an increased structural concern as it continues to mature.
Approved

View Planning Timeline