34 Greenway Lane, Budleigh Salterton, EX9 6SJ

UPRN:100040157879Detached House4 bedsBuilt 1930-1949

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band DEPC: D (60)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· freshEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoCrime· freshConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 5mo ago

34 Greenway Lane, Budleigh Salterton, EX9 6SJ

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

4 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

18 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

-- - --

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

34 Greenway Lane earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 82/100. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (57/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageHM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

82/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

No data

Crime Score

7/ 100

Low

Walkability

57/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 13Bike 30

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge2.5/15
claims [sold-comps +7.3%, £/sqft +7.3%] → measured edge +0.50pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp; AVM excluded (no market estimate available)
no market estimate available · snapshot 14 Nov 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 13.9%· as of 30 Oct 2026
Risk & liquidity9/15
74 sales/12mo in area
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 13.9%Valuation edge · as of 30 Oct 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 11 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Ask the agent why the price was reduced and whether a previous sale fell through.
1 price cut(s) recorded on the listing history.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
4. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate-

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth-5.2%

5y Growth-1.2%

10y Growth+2.2%

Last Sold Price£308,000 (2013-09-03)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0EX9 6SJ

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/2263/TRE
T17, Sweet Chestnut : cut back over extended branches by 1-2m to reshape and reduce risk of breakage. Maximum diameter of cuts 25mm. T18, Sycamore : reshape to retain screening form top of the lawn. Maximum diameter of cuts 100mm. See photograph 2 Appendix C for suggested final height. T28, Holly : reshape following repollarding of T29. T29, Holm Oak : repollard to 4m above ground level.
Pending
26/2235/FUL
Construction of a single storey garden room ancillary to the existing dwelling.
Pending
26/2202/VAR
Variation of condition 1 (approved plans) to planning permission 26/0859/VAR (variation of condition 1 (plans) of planning permission 25/2498/FUL (proposed new two storey side extension to integrate new replacement garage to the front, and a new single-storey rear extension; proposed works also include external landscaping and demolition of an existing single-storey detached garage) for changes in fenestration); proposed 2no. rooflights on east elevation
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership75.8%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeFreehold
Last Ownership Change2013-09-03
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

16 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£32,154

Population Density-

Owner Occupied62%

Age Distribution

0-15 18%16-64 57%65+ 25%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

St Peter's Church of England Primary School
0.2 mi
Good
Drake's Church of England Primary School
1.2 mi
GoodImproving
Otterton Church of England Primary School
1.9 mi
Good
Littleham Church of England Primary School
2.3 mi
Inspected as Littleham Church of England Primary School (URN 113370) on 17 May 2023

1 of 11 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

32A Greenway Lane
-
£160k
-
32 Greenway Lane
-
£180k
-
32A Greenway Lane
-
£146k
-
42 Greenway Lane
-
£375k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN