2 Agra Villas, Brixham Road, Kingswear, Dartmouth, TQ6 0BG

UPRN:100040274262Semi-Detached House3 bedsBuilt before 1900

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band CEPC: E (49)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· 1mo agoEPC· 4mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

2 Agra Villas, Brixham Road, Kingswear, Dartmouth, TQ6 0BG

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

5 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

18 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£513,000

£487k - £538kHigh

Estimate

£513k

Range

£487k – £538k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£1,950

£2k - £2k

Monthly

£1,950

Yield

4.54%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

2 Agra Villas earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 70/100. Investment score 59/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (51/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

70/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

59/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

6/ 100

Low

Walkability

51/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 14Bike 42

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesListing checked 4 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM -0.4% (HIGH)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 13 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100040274262· as of 13 Oct 2026
Rental economics0/40
gross yield 4.7% on contractual rent (listing-disclosed tenancy)
- listing_factscontractual rent 2000/mo (tenanted)· as of 4 Nov 2026
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -833/mo, -42% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 4 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 34 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 4 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.7/15
106 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£386,000£592,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£515,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£1,950/mo

Evidenced range £1,750-£2,150

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £171,550
Net cash flow: -£388/mo
Cash on cash: -2.7%
Score at this price: 15

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.12 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100040274262Valuation edge · as of 13 Oct 2026
listing_factscontractual rent 2000/mo (tenanted)Rental economics · as of 4 Nov 2026
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 4 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 34 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →flood, subsidence, crime, environment - the full domain

Plan

Before you offer

1. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£513,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£1,950

Gross Yield4.54%

1y Growth-

3y Growth-3.4%

5y Growth-1.6%

10y Growth+1.5%

Last Sold Price£375,000 (2019-03-14)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonModerate
MiningLow
LandslideModerate
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0TQ6 0BG

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

3072/26/TPO
TPO 885 - T1 Holm Oak - Height 12m remove 5m growth to just above historic pollard points - tree is heavily growing towards the property.
Pending
2969/26/TPO
TPO 453 - T001 - Sessile Oak - Crown reduction to previous pruning points, or by removing approximately 2.0 metres from branch tips, as appropriate. Prune back the two lowest secondary branches to their respective parent branches or the main stem. Remove all epicormic growth arising from the main stem, cutting back to the point of origin.
Pending
2972/26/TCA
T1 – Common Beech - Fell - due to the potential for tree-related loading or movement to contribute to further structural deterioration of retaining wall T2 – Lawson’s Cypress - Fell - due to the potential for tree-related loading or movement to contribute to further structural deterioration of retaining wall
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership64.9%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeFreehold
Last Ownership Change2019-03-14
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

16 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£29,721

Population Density57 /km²

Owner Occupied82%

Age Distribution

0-15 8%16-64 50%65+ 42%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Dartmouth Academy
1.2 mi
Good
St John the Baptist Roman Catholic Primary School, Dartmouth
1.3 mi
Good
Stoke Fleming Community Primary School
2.3 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.
Galmpton Church of England Primary School
3.0 mi
OutstandingImproving

3 of 14 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

3 Agra Villas
-
£274k
-
2 Agra Villas
-
£375k
-
1 Agra Villas
-
£400k
-
1 Agra Villas
-
£380k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN