162 Langley Crescent, Plymouth, PL6 6ET

UPRN:100040458353End Terrace HouseBeds -Built 1967-1975

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band AEPC: D (60)

Data freshness:Planning· 4mo agoOwnership· 1mo agoEPC· 3mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 6mo ago

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

7 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

17 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£194,000

£174k - £213kMedium

Estimate

£194k

Range

£174k – £213k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£900

£800 - £950

Monthly

£900

Yield

5.84%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

162 Langley Crescent earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 66/100. Investment score 58/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is limited (37/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

66/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

58/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

23/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

37/ 100

Mixed

Transit & Bike

Transit 19Bike 40

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesListing checked 10 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +4.6% (MEDIUM)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (MEDIUM confidence) · snapshot 13 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100040458353· as of 13 Oct 2026
Rental economics5.8/40
gross yield 5.8%; range width penalty ×0.87
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 900/mo (range 800-950)· as of 13 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -249/mo, -28% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 10 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 39 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 10 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity12.8/15
468 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 20%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£139,000£212,500

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£185,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£900/mo

Evidenced range £800-£950

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £58,000
Net cash flow: -£1/mo
Cash on cash: -0.0%
Score at this price: 19

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.44 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100040458353Valuation edge · as of 13 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 900/mo (range 800-950)Rental economics · as of 13 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 10 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 10 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 900/mo (range 800-950)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 39 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£194,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£900

Gross Yield5.84%

1y Growth-

3y Growth+0.4%

5y Growth+2.8%

10y Growth+2.6%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonModerate
MiningModerate
LandslideModerate
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0PL6 6ET

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/01337/AMD
Non-material Amendment: Changing rear ground floor windows to bi-fold doors (amendment of application: 26/00344/FUL)
Approved
26/01249/FUL
Perimeter wooden fencing (reterospective)
Pending
26/01147/FUL
Single storey rear extension (part retrospective)
Approved

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership51.1%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease Type-
Last Ownership Change-
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

3 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£28,992

Population Density2,470 /km²

Owner Occupied43%

Age Distribution

0-15 25%16-64 61%65+ 14%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Oakwood Primary Academy
0.4 mi
Area grades2024
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.
Beechwood Primary Academy
0.5 mi
Area grades2024
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.
Widewell Primary Academy
0.5 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.
Notre Dame RC School
0.9 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.

1 of 12 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

149 Langley Crescent
-
£120k
-
157 Langley Crescent
-
£140k
-
163 Langley Crescent
-
£165k
-
149 Langley Crescent
-
£150k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN