30 Harden Lane, Wilsden, Bradford, BD15 0EU

UPRN:100051170641Semi-Detached House3 bedsBuilt 1950-1966

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band CEPC: D (59)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 6mo ago

30 Harden Lane, Wilsden, Bradford, BD15 0EU

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

4 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£284,000

£269k - £298kHigh

Estimate

£284k

Range

£269k – £298k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

30 Harden Lane earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 62/100. Investment score 56/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is limited (23/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

62/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

56/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

33/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

23/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 19Bike 18

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM -0.4% (HIGH), sold-comps -6.3%, £/sqft -6.2%] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 12 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100051170641· as of 12 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 8.7%· as of 18 Oct 2026
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
172 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100051170641Valuation edge · as of 12 Oct 2026
property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 8.7%Valuation edge · as of 18 Oct 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 2 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
2. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£284,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth+60.2%

3y Growth+3.9%

5y Growth+3.5%

10y Growth+4.7%

Last Sold Price£227,000 (2022-03-18)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonModerate
MiningLow
LandslideSignificant
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0BD15 0EU

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/02297/PN3MA
Change of use of upper floors of Spring Mill House to form 8No. Apartments
Pending
26/02685/TPO
T1 Elm - Fell. T2 Elm - Fell.
Pending
26/02517/HOU
Demolition of existing garage and construction of single storey side and rear wraparound extension. Landscaping works to garden
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership73.2%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeFreehold
Last Ownership Change2022-03-18
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

6 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£28,424

Population Density366 /km²

Owner Occupied79%

Age Distribution

0-15 19%16-64 64%65+ 17%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Wilsden Primary School
0.5 mi
Good
Harden Primary School
0.8 mi
Good
Parkside School
1.0 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.
Cullingworth Village Primary School
1.4 mi
Good

4 of 14 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

50A Harden Lane
-
£525k
-
34 Harden Lane
-
£240k
-
52 Harden Lane
-
£390k
-
48 Harden Lane
-
£440k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN