15 Peakdean Lane, Friston, Eastbourne, BN20 0JD

UPRN:100060113487Detached Bungalow3 bedsBuilt 1950-1966

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band EEPC: D (66)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 3mo agoOwnership· freshEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 1mo ago

15 Peakdean Lane, Friston, Eastbourne, BN20 0JD

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

18 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£548,000

£520k - £575kHigh

Estimate

£548k

Range

£520k – £575k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£1,550

£1k - £2k

Monthly

£1,550

Yield

3.61%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

15 Peakdean Lane earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 63/100. Investment score 60/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (16/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

63/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

60/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

14/ 100

Low

Walkability

16/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 7Bike 29

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence1 independent sourceListing checked 6 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge1.9/15
claims [AVM +6.0% (HIGH), sold-comps +2.3%, £/sqft +2.3%] → measured edge +0.38pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 9 Nov 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100060113487· as of 9 Nov 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 7 comps, dispersion 11%· as of 7 Nov 2026
Rental economics0/40
gross yield 3.6%; range width penalty ×0.68
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1550/mo (range 1350-1750)· as of 9 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -1,163/mo, -75% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 6 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 281 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 6 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
241 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£386,000£592,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£515,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£1,550/mo

Evidenced range £1,350-£1,750

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £171,550
Net cash flow: -£665/mo
Cash on cash: -4.7%
Score at this price: 16

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 0.89 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100060113487Valuation edge · as of 9 Nov 2026
property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 7 comps, dispersion 11%Valuation edge · as of 7 Nov 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1550/mo (range 1350-1750)Rental economics · as of 9 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 6 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 6 Nov 2026

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 1550/mo (range 1350-1750)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 281 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£548,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£1,550

Gross Yield3.61%

1y Growth-

3y Growth-0.9%

5y Growth+0.6%

10y Growth+2.4%

Last Sold Price£297,500 (2005-01-12)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonModerate
MiningLow
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

1BN20 0JD

Approval Rate

100%12mo

Development

low

SDNP/26/03896/TPO
T1 Conifer - Reduce crown by 50% to reduce the windsail of the tree. T2 Sycamore - Reduce crown by 50% to reduce the windsail of the tree. T3 Sycamore - Reduce crown by 50% to reduce the windsail of the tree.
Rejected
SDNP/26/02426/TPO
G1 Leylandii - Reduce by approximately 12 feet to be in line with the rest of the group that they are in. T4 blue spruce tree - Remove the two lowest limbs and any low dead branches. Remove the dead wood for safety reasons and to remove the lower arms.
Approved
SDNP/26/02152/TPO
T3 - Holm Oak - Reduce height up to 4m, sides up to 2m; T25 - western red Cedar - Reduced 3m in height; T10 - Corsican Pine - Thin (20%) and reduce height where possible by 2m; T17 - Western Red Cedar - Reduced in height by 4m
Approved

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership75%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeFreehold
Last Ownership Change2005-01-12
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

18 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£33,376

Population Density52 /km²

Owner Occupied84%

Age Distribution

0-15 9%16-64 49%65+ 42%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Pashley Down Infant School
1.9 mi
Good
The South Downs School
2.0 mi
Inspected as The South Downs Community Special School (URN 114692) on 25 Jun 2014
Motcombe Infants' School
2.4 mi
Good
Ocklynge Junior School
2.4 mi
Area grades2024
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.

4 of 9 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

13 Peakdean Lane
-
£650k
-
23 Peakdean Lane
-
£630k
-
14 Peakdean Lane
-
£480k
-
16 Peakdean Lane
-
£640k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN