77 Rosemary Gardens, Blackwater, Camberley, GU17 0NJ

UPRN:100060415683Detached Bungalow2 bedsBuilt 1967-1975

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band EEPC: D (65)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 3mo agoOwnership· freshEPC· 1mo agoRisk· 5mo agoCrime· freshConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 1mo ago

77 Rosemary Gardens, Blackwater, Camberley, GU17 0NJ

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

2 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£495,000

£446k - £545kMedium

Estimate

£495k

Range

£446k – £545k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£1,950

£2k - £2k

Monthly

£1,950

Yield

4.93%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

77 Rosemary Gardens earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 80/100. Investment score 61/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is good (70/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

80/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

61/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

7/ 100

Low

Walkability

70/ 100

High

Transit & Bike

Transit 19Bike 57

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesListing checked 10 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +4.0% (MEDIUM)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (MEDIUM confidence) · snapshot 10 Nov 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100060415683· as of 10 Nov 2026
Rental economics0/40
gross yield 4.9%; range width penalty ×0.84
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1950/mo (range 1800-2150)· as of 10 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -701/mo, -36% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 10 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 71 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 10 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity12.8/15
109 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 20%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£356,000£546,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£475,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£1,950/mo

Evidenced range £1,800-£2,150

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £157,550
Net cash flow: -£253/mo
Cash on cash: -1.9%
Score at this price: 13

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.22 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100060415683Valuation edge · as of 10 Nov 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1950/mo (range 1800-2150)Rental economics · as of 10 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 10 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 10 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 1950/mo (range 1800-2150)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 71 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£495,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£1,950

Gross Yield4.93%

1y Growth-0.4%

3y Growth-0.9%

5y Growth-0.3%

10y Growth+2.4%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0GU17 0NJ

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/01868/TPO
G1. Scotts Pine - Reduce the lowest branches to give approx 3m clearance to the dwellings either side of the group by cutting back to suitable growth points and to give clearance to the telephone wires as required.
Pending
26/01831/TPO
T1. Oak - Make cuts to suitable growth points, retaining a balanced, natural crown shape and the tree's overall amenity. The work will be limited to the branches closest to the outbuilding.
Pending
26/01791/FUL
Erection of a two storey side extension to form a separate residential dwelling and creation of new access and dropped kerb onto Binsted Drive (alternative design)
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership71.1%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeFreehold
Last Ownership Change-
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

16 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£39,341

Population Density4,028 /km²

Owner Occupied89%

Age Distribution

0-15 15%16-64 58%65+ 27%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Frogmore Junior School
0.4 mi
Good
Frogmore Infant School
0.4 mi
Good
Hawley Primary School
0.8 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.
Potley Hill Primary School
0.9 mi
Area grades2024
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.

2 of 11 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

91 Rosemary Gardens
-
£460k
-
101 Rosemary Gardens
-
£483k
-
101 Rosemary Gardens
-
£485k
-
75 Rosemary Gardens
-
£495k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN