High Gaut, The Front, St. Margarets Bay, Dover, CT15 6HR

UPRN:100060914352-Beds -Built -

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band GEPC: -

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· freshRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 1mo ago

High Gaut, The Front, St. Margarets Bay, Dover, CT15 6HR

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

15 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£526,000

£474k - £579kMedium

Estimate

£526k

Range

£474k – £579k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

High Gaut earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 61/100. Investment score 55/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is limited (6/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

61/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

55/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

18/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

6/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 39Bike 27

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge-0.6/15
claims [AVM -42.6% (MEDIUM)] → measured edge -0.12pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp; asking more than 10% above the estimate (measured -0.33pp)
Market estimate used (MEDIUM confidence) · snapshot 10 Nov 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100060914352· as of 10 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity12.8/15
116 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 20%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100060914352Valuation edge · as of 10 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 5 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
2. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£526,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth-2.7%

5y Growth+0.5%

10y Growth+2.4%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonModerate
MiningLow
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0CT15 6HR

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/00606
Regulation 5 (The Electronic Communications Code (Conditions and restrictions) (Amendment) Regulations 2017) notification for the installation of a new pole
Pending
TC/26/00156
Crown reduce by approximately 2-3 metres in height and 2-3 metres laterally and remove or heavily reduce decayed stem of one Beech (T1) situated within a conservation area
Pending
TC/26/00153
T1- (Sycamore) reduce overhanging crown by up to 2 metres; T2- (Norway maple) Fell to ground level; 3- (Poplar) reduce the length of several over extended branches; 4 - (Sycamore) prune selected branches to balance crown, all situated within a conservation area.
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership81.7%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease Type-
Last Ownership Change-
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

23 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£33,704

Population Density103 /km²

Owner Occupied77%

Age Distribution

0-15 14%16-64 55%65+ 31%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Portal House School
0.6 mi
-
St Margaret's-at-Cliffe Primary School
0.6 mi
Area grades2025
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.
Duke of York's Royal Military School
2.2 mi
Good
Langdon Primary School
2.4 mi
-

6 of 11 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

White Cliffes Cottage The Front
-
£380k
-
White Cliffes Cottage The Front
-
£315k
-
White Cliffes Bungalow The Front
-
£293k
-
White Cliffes Bungalow The Front
-
£190k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN