24 Kingfisher Walk, Ash, Aldershot, GU12 6RF

UPRN:100061375397Purpose Built Flat1 bedsBuilt 1983-1990

LeaseholdCouncil Tax: Band BEPC: C (76)

Data freshness:Price Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 6mo ago

24 Kingfisher Walk, Ash, Aldershot, GU12 6RF

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

5 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

20 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£166,000

£157k - £174kHigh

Estimate

£166k

Range

£157k – £174k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£800

£750 - £850

Monthly

£800

Yield

5.82%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

24 Kingfisher Walk earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 70/100. Investment score 59/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is limited (56/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

70/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

59/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

23/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

56/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 13Bike 55

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence1 independent sourceListing checked 30 Oct 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge2.5/15
claims [AVM +0.6% (HIGH), sold-comps +9.8%, £/sqft +9.9%] → measured edge +0.50pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 9 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100061375397· as of 9 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 6 comps, dispersion 19.6%· as of 24 Oct 2026
Rental economics6.2/40
gross yield 5.8%; range width penalty ×0.95
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 800/mo (range 750-850)· as of 9 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -309/mo, -39% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; disclosed service charge and ground rent); fails the stress - earns nothing
- listing_factsservice charge / ground rent from the advert· as of 30 Oct 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 253 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 30 Oct 2026
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
312 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£124,000£189,500

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£165,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£800/mo

Evidenced range £750-£850

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £51,600
Net cash flow: -£3/mo
Cash on cash: -0.1%
Score at this price: 23

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.44 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100061375397Valuation edge · as of 9 Oct 2026
property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 6 comps, dispersion 19.6%Valuation edge · as of 24 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 800/mo (range 750-850)Rental economics · as of 9 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
listing_factsservice charge / ground rent from the advertStress margin · as of 30 Oct 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 30 Oct 2026

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 800/mo (range 750-850)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 253 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£166,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£800

Gross Yield5.82%

1y Growth-4.1%

3y Growth+0.4%

5y Growth+1.7%

10y Growth+2.8%

Last Sold Price£166,000 (2021-09-03)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0GU12 6RF

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/T/00283
T1 Oak - Crown lift and reduction by 2m (TPO - P1/201/339)
Pending
26/00529/PDCPP
Erection of a rear roof dormer extension with the addition of three rooflights to the front roof slope
Pending
26/T/00256
Ash Tree: Fell/Removal. Reason: showing clear and significant symptoms consistent with ash dieback (Hymenoscyphus fraxineus). Removal will eliminate the developing safety risk and allow the site to be managed appropriately (TPO No 1 of 2006)
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership62.1%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining999+ yrs
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeLeasehold
Last Ownership Change2021-09-03
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

7 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£39,985

Population Density-

Owner Occupied56%

Age Distribution

0-15 20%16-64 65%65+ 15%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Shawfield Primary School
0.3 mi
Good
Walsh CofE Junior School
0.5 mi
Inspected as Walsh CofE Junior School (URN 125156) on 14 Jun 2022
Walsh CofE Infant School
0.5 mi
Area grades2025
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.
Ash Grange Nursery and Primary School
0.6 mi
-

4 of 12 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

40 Kingfisher Walk
-
£130k
-
27 Kingfisher Walk
-
£160k
-
9 Kingfisher Walk
-
£345k
-
37 Kingfisher Walk
-
£382k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN