23 Tupwood Lane, Caterham, CR3 6DB

UPRN:100061575892Bungalow Property3 bedsBuilt 1950-1966

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band FEPC: C (69)

Data freshness:Price Paid· freshPlanning· freshEPC· 4mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

2 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£639,000

£607k - £671kHigh

Estimate

£639k

Range

£607k – £671k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£2,350

£2k - £3k

Monthly

£2,350

Yield

4.41%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

23 Tupwood Lane earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 59/100. Investment score 55/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is limited (10/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

59/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

55/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

34/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

10/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 9Bike 15

Walk Score, out of 100

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£639,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£2,350

Gross Yield4.41%

1y Growth-

3y Growth-1.2%

5y Growth+0.2%

10y Growth+2.4%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonModerate
MiningLow
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

1CR3 6DB

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

2026/639
Replacement of awnings.
Pending
2026/1264
Alterations to side a rear ground floor fenestrations Lawful Development Certificate (proposed)
Pending
2026/1339/TPO
T6 - Corsican Pine - Remove deadwood greater than 25mm in diameter. T9 - Corsican Pine - Remove deadwood within crown T12 - Corsican Pine -Remove deadwood greater than 25mm in diameter. T15 - Corsican Pine - Remove deadwood within crown. T16 - Corsican Pine - Remove deadwood within crown. T19 - Corsican Pine - Remove deadwood within crown. T22 - Corsican Pine - Remove deadwood greater than 25mm in diameter. T23 - Corsican Pine - Remove deadwood greater than 25mm in diameter. T39 - Damson Fell to 1m above ground level. T43 - Ash - Fell tree as close to ground level as possible. T44 - Beech - Laterally reduce Nw side by 2.5m to a suitable lateral branch to leave as natural a shape as possible, carry out a climbing inspection on lowest two unions and report. T45 - Beech - Sever ivy at base T47 Hawthorn - Coppice ( Orange dot sprayed on back ) T48 Hawthorn - Sever Ivy ( Orange dot sprayed on Ivy ) T49 Beech - Sever ivy at base T50 - Common Oak - Sever ivy at base. T52 Ash - Fell to ground level ( Orange dot sprayed on ivy ) T55 Ash - Fell to ground level ( Orange dot sprayed on ivy ) T56 Ash - Fell to ground level ( Orange dot sprayed on ivy ) T57 Ash - Fell to ground level ( Orange dot sprayed on ivy ) T58 Ash - Fell to ground level ( Orange dot sprayed on ivy ) All trees Listed Above - Works are recommended following a recent arboricultural health and safety inspection. The proposed pruning will reduce the risk of branch failure and potential harm to to members of the public, property, vehicles and site users. Removal of dead, diseased, damaged or defective branches will improve the safety of the trees and surrounding area. The works form part of a programme of routine tree maintenance in accordance with good arboricultural practice. Removal of defective growth and deadwood will improve the long-term health and condition of the tree. The proposed works are proportionate and will retain the tree's amenity value whilst addressing identified defects. T39, T43, t52, T55, T56, T57, T58 fells - The extent of defects and deterioration makes retention unsustainable from both an arboricultural and risk-management perspective. risk of partial or whole-tree failure cannot be adequately mitigated through pruning alone.
Pending

View Planning Timeline