11 Garnet Field, Yateley, GU46 6FN

UPRN:100062349089Detached House6 bedsBuilt 2007-2011

FreeholdCouncil Tax: -EPC: C (80)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· freshEPC· 5mo agoRisk· 5mo agoCrime· freshConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

2 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

18 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£900,000

£855k - £945kHigh

Estimate

£900k

Range

£855k – £945k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£2,750

£2k - £3k

Monthly

£2,750

Yield

3.67%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

11 Garnet Field earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 71/100. Investment score 57/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (33/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

71/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

57/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

9/ 100

Low

Walkability

33/ 100

Mixed

Transit & Bike

Transit 3Bike 25

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesListing checked 13 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +0.0% (HIGH), sold-comps -30.8%, £/sqft -30.7%] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 9 Nov 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100062349089· as of 9 Nov 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 6 comps, dispersion 23.3%· as of 15 Nov 2026
Rental economics0/40
gross yield 3.7%; range width penalty ×0.69
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 2750/mo (range 2400-3100)· as of 9 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -1,906/mo, -69% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 13 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 151 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 13 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
162 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£675,000£1,035,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£900,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£2,750/mo

Evidenced range £2,400-£3,100

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £306,300
Net cash flow: -£1,134/mo
Cash on cash: -4.4%
Score at this price: 15

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 0.91 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100062349089Valuation edge · as of 9 Nov 2026
property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 6 comps, dispersion 23.3%Valuation edge · as of 15 Nov 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 2750/mo (range 2400-3100)Rental economics · as of 9 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 13 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 13 Nov 2026

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 2750/mo (range 2400-3100)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 151 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£900,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£2,750

Gross Yield3.67%

1y Growth-

3y Growth+0.8%

5y Growth+1.3%

10y Growth+1.9%

Last Sold Price£680,000 (2017-02-17)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0GU46 6FN

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/01826/TPO
T1. Dawn Redwood - Removal (to include the stump being ground out) It is recommended that the tree be removed and replaced with an appropriately selected tree of suitable ultimate size and form. Removal would eliminate the increasing risk associated with the tree's continued decline and provide an opportunity to establish a replacement tree that can contribute to the site in the longer term." "Based on the current structural assessment and judged level of risk it is recommended that the tree is removed in its entirety as soon as practicable, ideally within 6-9 months." 2. To plant, in the failing Dawn Redwood location (T1) and in suitable soil/compost, a Betula Utilis Jacquemontii "Snow Queen" Tree. Awarded RHS Award of Garden Merit. Size to be purchased 8-10 cm girth, 3-3.5 metres in 28L pot. Final size 7 x 3.5 metres in 20 years. (T1) is indicated in the site plan/sketch plan on page 5 of the enclosed report.
Pending
26/01814/HOU
Replacement detached garage
Pending
26/01764/CA
T1. Beech - Self Planted, 1m formative prune into circular shape
Pending

View Planning Timeline