39 Kirkwall, Corby, NN17 2QZ

UPRN:10006864997Purpose Built Flat1 bedsBuilt 1976-1982

LeaseholdCouncil Tax: Band AEPC: C (73)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· freshEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

today

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£94,000

£85k - £104kMedium

Estimate

£94k

Range

£85k – £104k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£600

£550 - £650

Monthly

£600

Yield

7.20%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

39 Kirkwall earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 72/100. Investment score 62/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (49/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

72/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

62/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

12/ 100

Low

Walkability

49/ 100

Mixed

Transit & Bike

Transit 34Bike 38

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Reduced confidence2 independent sourcesLead to verifyListing checked 10 Nov 2026

Fewer independent sources agree, or a component could not be scored.

Check before relying on this score: leasehold with no service charge disclosed - the stress test assumes GBP 0. It ranks after every home whose inputs are verified.

Valuation edge2.5/15
claims [AVM -6.4% (MEDIUM), sold-comps +19.4%, £/sqft +19.6%] → measured edge +0.50pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (MEDIUM confidence) · snapshot 13 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10006864997· as of 13 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 10 comps, dispersion 10.5%· as of 1 Nov 2026
Rental economics15.3/40
gross yield 7.2%; range width penalty ×0.87
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 600/mo (range 550-650)· as of 13 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -111/mo, -18% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing; leasehold with no service charge disclosed - the stress assumes GBP 0
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 10 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 40 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 10 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity12.8/15
387 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 20%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£75,000£115,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£100,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£600/mo

Evidenced range £550-£650

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £31,300
Net cash flow: £78/mo
Cash on cash: 3.0%
Score at this price: 31

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.78 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10006864997Valuation edge · as of 13 Oct 2026
property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 10 comps, dispersion 10.5%Valuation edge · as of 1 Nov 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 600/mo (range 550-650)Rental economics · as of 13 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 10 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 10 Nov 2026

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is reduced
fewer independent sources agree, or a component could not be scored
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 600/mo (range 550-650)
Stress margin needs verification before you rely on it
costs not disclosed by the advert

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£94,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£600

Gross Yield7.20%

1y Growth-

3y Growth+0.3%

5y Growth+2.2%

10y Growth+5.3%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0NN17 2QZ

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/03174/LDP
Demolish single storey rear utility room and canopy and erect single storey rear extension
Pending
26/03104/FUL
Single storey side extension
Pending
26/02827/LDP
The proposal is to replace the existing front boundary fence with a new anthracite grey composite fence. The replacement fence will remain on the existing boundary line and will be approximately 1.40 metres high, matching the height of the existing fence. There will be no increase in height and no change to the position or alignment of the existing boundary. The existing fence will be removed and replaced with composite fence panels and suitable posts. The proposal does not involve any alteration to the highway, vehicular or pedestrian access, drainage, buildings or hardstanding.
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership58%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining114 yrs
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeLeasehold
Last Ownership Change-
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

7 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£32,882

Population Density7,258 /km²

Owner Occupied56%

Age Distribution

0-15 22%16-64 68%65+ 10%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Lodge Park Academy
0.1 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.
Woodnewton- A Learning Community
0.3 mi
Good
Studfall Junior Academy
0.4 mi
Good
Studfall Infant Academy
0.6 mi
Good

3 of 11 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

7 Kirkwall
-
£190k
-
12 Kirkwall
-
£150k
-
2 Kirkwall
-
£165k
-
13 Kirkwall
-
£100k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN