Upper Maisonette, 60 Oakley Road, London, N1 3LS

UPRN:10007028720-Beds -Built -

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band EEPC: -

Data freshness:Listing· freshOwnership· freshRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 6mo ago

Upper Maisonette, 60 Oakley Road, London, N1 3LS

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

18 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£2,796,000

£2.24M - £3.35MLow

Estimate

£2.80M

Range

£2.24M – £3.35M

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Upper Maisonette earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 69/100. Investment score 58/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is limited (36/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

69/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

58/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

18/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

36/ 100

Mixed

Transit & Bike

Transit 75Bike 68

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

estimate implies a 80% discount - beyond plausibility (gate 50%); suspected unit/basis mismatch, not a realisable edge

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion

Property risk deep-dive →flood, subsidence, crime, environment - the full domain

Plan

Before you offer

1. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£2,796,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth+87.9%

3y Growth-1.3%

5y Growth-0.6%

10y Growth+0.5%

Last Sold Price£1,496,000 (2025-06-06)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

5N1 3LS

Approval Rate

100%12mo

Development

low

P2026/2894/TRE
My client would like to reduce a Sycamore (T1) by removing 4m branch length. Their reason is to maintain it's size in relation to the small garden and space it is growing in.
Pending
P2026/2884/TRE
TPO Tree T1 - Eucalyptus - Prune to clear building by 3m by removal of smaller diameter branches - this tree leans towards, and grows over the roof of the adjacent property - this work is required to maintain clearance from the property Non TPO trees - T2, T3, Leylandii - remove all growth overhanging property to rear (2m approx. lateral branch removal)
Pending
P2026/2883/TRE
T1 - Cypress - Reduce height by 3m, shape side growth by up to 1m. Crown lift by 1m. this tree is growing in a raised border with limited room for growth either above or below ground.
Pending

View Planning Timeline