593 Tanworth Lane, Shirley, Solihull, B90 4JE

UPRN:100071014537Detached House4 bedsBuilt 1950-1966

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band GEPC: D (63)

Data freshness:Listing· freshOwnership· freshEPC· 3mo agoRisk· 5mo agoCrime· freshConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 1mo ago

593 Tanworth Lane, Shirley, Solihull, B90 4JE

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£692,000

£657k - £726kHigh

Estimate

£692k

Range

£657k – £726k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£2,350

£2k - £3k

Monthly

£2,350

Yield

4.34%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

593 Tanworth Lane earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 76/100. Investment score 57/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (64/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

76/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

57/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

11/ 100

Low

Walkability

64/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 43Bike 35

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesListing checked 12 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +6.1% (HIGH)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 9 Nov 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100071014537· as of 9 Nov 2026
Rental economics0/40
gross yield 4.3%; range width penalty ×0.77
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 2350/mo (range 2100-2600)· as of 9 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
- listing_factslisting text signals condition works - budget before trusting any yield· as of 12 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -1,145/mo, -49% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 12 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 80 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 12 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
576 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£487,500£747,500

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£650,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£2,350/mo

Evidenced range £2,100-£2,600

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £218,800
Net cash flow: -£567/mo
Cash on cash: -3.1%
Score at this price: 15

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.07 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100071014537Valuation edge · as of 9 Nov 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 2350/mo (range 2100-2600)Rental economics · as of 9 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
listing_factslisting text signals condition works - budget before trusting any yieldRental economics · as of 12 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 12 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 12 Nov 2026

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 2350/mo (range 2100-2600)
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
listing text signals condition works - budget before trusting any yield

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£692,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£2,350

Gross Yield4.34%

1y Growth-

3y Growth+1.5%

5y Growth+1.4%

10y Growth+2.8%

Last Sold Price£249,000 (2000-09-21)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

2B90 4JE

Approval Rate

100%12mo

Development

low

PL/2026/01834/PPFL
Demolition of existing dwellinghouse and erection of replacement dwellinghouse and associated works.
Pending
PL/2026/01489/MINFHO
Single storey ground floor side extension to existing with raised terrace to rear of property. Cladding added to areas of existing house.
Approved
PL/2026/01348/CLOPUD
Certificate of lawful development for proposed replacement of existing store/summer house with ancillary/annexe (mobile structure) on an axel.
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership61.8%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeFreehold
Last Ownership Change2000-09-21
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

13 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£36,672

Population Density2,033 /km²

Owner Occupied83%

Age Distribution

0-15 20%16-64 58%65+ 22%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

St Patricks Church of England Primary Academy
0.5 mi
Good
Cheswick Green Primary School
0.6 mi
Good
Dickens Heath Community Primary School
1.0 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.
Tidbury Green School
1.2 mi
Good

2 of 10 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

586 Tanworth Lane
-
£287k
-
Mount Dairy Farm, 551 Tanworth Lane
-
£475k
-
577 Tanworth Lane
-
£658k
-
574 Tanworth Lane
-
£380k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN