32 Farbrook Way, Willenhall, WV12 4SG

UPRN:100071108973-Beds -Built 1967-1975

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band DEPC: D (64)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· freshRisk· 5mo agoCrime· freshConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 1mo ago

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

17 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£284,000

£255k - £312kMedium

Estimate

£284k

Range

£255k – £312k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

32 Farbrook Way earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 74/100. Investment score 62/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (52/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

74/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

62/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

11/ 100

Low

Walkability

52/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 35Bike 57

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +3.2% (MEDIUM)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (MEDIUM confidence) · snapshot 14 Nov 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100071108973· as of 14 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity12.8/15
189 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 20%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100071108973Valuation edge · as of 14 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 11 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
2. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
3. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£284,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-5.4%

3y Growth+3.1%

5y Growth+4.1%

10y Growth+5.2%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonModerate
MiningSignificant
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0WV12 4SG

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/1054
Full planning application for a two-storey side and rear extension with single-storey elements, and a single-storey front extension.
Pending
26/1164
G1 - One Ash & Two Lime - Crown reduction to give 2 metres clearance from units. T2 Sycamore - Fell. T3 Sycamore - Fell. T4 Sycamore - Fell. T5 Sycamore - Fell. T6 Sycamore - Fell. G2 - Group of Sycamore trees - Crown reduction of trees to give 2 metres clearance from units.
Pending
26/1044
T1 - Sycamore - Fell. T2 - Sycamore - crown reduction by 3 metres. T4 - Sycamore - crown reductionby 3 metres. T6 - Sycamore - crown reduction by 3 metres and crown lift to 4 metres above ground level. T7 - Sycamore - Fell. T8 - Sycamore - crown reductionby 2 metres.
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership66.9%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease Type-
Last Ownership Change-
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

6 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£29,112

Population Density-

Owner Occupied90%

Age Distribution

0-15 12%16-64 53%65+ 35%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Pool Hayes Primary School
0.1 mi
Inspected as Pool Hayes Primary School (URN 104191) on 11 Jul 2023
Pool Hayes Academy
0.2 mi
Good
New Invention Infant School
0.5 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.
New Invention Learning Academy
0.5 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.

1 of 10 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

3 Farbrook Way
-
£287k
-
5 Farbrook Way
-
£304k
-
23 Farbrook Way
-
£245k
-
11 Farbrook Way
-
£240k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN