Cedar House, Hill Farm Lane, Chalfont St. Giles, HP8 4NT

UPRN:10008028306Detached House5 bedsBuilt 1996-2002

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band HEPC: C (77)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 3mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 5mo ago

Cedar House, Hill Farm Lane, Chalfont St. Giles, HP8 4NT

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

6 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£2,476,000

£2.35M - £2.60MHigh

Estimate

£2.48M

Range

£2.35M – £2.60M

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£6,650

£6k - £8k

Monthly

£6,650

Yield

3.20%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Cedar House earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 68/100. Investment score 63/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (16/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

68/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

63/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

11/ 100

Low

Walkability

16/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 17Bike 23

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

asking price missing or outside scoring range
listing is 'Sold subject to contract' - sale already progressing, not an actionable opportunity

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Economics

What happens to your money

Your assumptions

Purchase price£2,495,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£6,650/mo

Evidenced range £5,700-£7,550

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £962,950
Net cash flow: -£3,817/mo
Cash on cash: -4.8%
Score at this price: -

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 0.79 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion

Property risk deep-dive →flood, subsidence, crime, environment - the full domain

Plan

Before you offer

1. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£2,476,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£6,650

Gross Yield3.20%

1y Growth-

3y Growth-8.7%

5y Growth+0.4%

10y Growth+1.4%

Last Sold Price£1,630,000 (2004-01-05)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningLow
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseBelow 40 dB

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

2HP8 4NT

Approval Rate

100%12mo

Development

low

PL/26/07308/FA
Upgrade underfloor electric heating system with air source heat pump and solar panels.
Pending
PL/26/08166/CONDA
Approval of condition 14 (remediation verification report) of planning permission PL/25/0306/VRC (Approval of condition 2 (materials) and variation of condition 21 (approved plans) of planning permission PL/21/3281/FA (Demolition of existing buildings, redevelopment of site to include erection of 5 detached houses and associated car parking) to allow changes to design)
Pending
PL/26/07580/TP
Prune the overhanging lateral branches back to our shared property boundary line and/or early point to 1 x Field Maple (T5) due to the tree causing heavy suppression, the lawn beneath the canopy is actively dying out, and established Red Robin shrubs along the border are suffering severe dieback due to the critical lack of light - this targeted reduction will allow light to filter back into the garden to save the domestic landscaping, while fully maintaining the overall health and visual appearance of the protected tree.
Pending

View Planning Timeline