Cheylesmore, Christopher Close, Naphill, High Wycombe, HP14 4SF

UPRN:100081089649Bungalow Property4 bedsBuilt 1967-1975

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band FEPC: C (69)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· 1mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

Cheylesmore, Christopher Close, Naphill, High Wycombe, HP14 4SF

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

6 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

17 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£863,000

£820k - £906kHigh

Estimate

£863k

Range

£820k – £906k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£2,650

£2k - £3k

Monthly

£2,650

Yield

3.98%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Cheylesmore earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 73/100. Investment score 65/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (38/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

73/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

65/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

11/ 100

Low

Walkability

38/ 100

Mixed

Transit & Bike

Transit 8Bike 23

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesListing checked 3 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +7.3% (HIGH)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 12 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100081089649· as of 12 Oct 2026
Rental economics0/40
gross yield 4.5% on contractual rent (listing-disclosed tenancy)
- listing_factscontractual rent 3000/mo (tenanted)· as of 3 Nov 2026
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -1,300/mo, -43% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 3 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 1 price cut(s), 193 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 3 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
159 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£600,000£920,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£800,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£2,650/mo

Evidenced range £2,300-£3,000

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £271,300
Net cash flow: -£865/mo
Cash on cash: -3.8%
Score at this price: 15

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 0.98 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100081089649Valuation edge · as of 12 Oct 2026
listing_factscontractual rent 3000/mo (tenanted)Rental economics · as of 3 Nov 2026
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 3 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 3 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 1 price cut(s), 193 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →flood, subsidence, crime, environment - the full domain

Plan

Before you offer

1. Ask the agent why the price was reduced and whether a previous sale fell through.
1 price cut(s) recorded on the listing history.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£863,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£2,650

Gross Yield3.98%

1y Growth-

3y Growth-1.7%

5y Growth+1.3%

10y Growth+2.0%

Last Sold Price£415,000 (2003-05-01)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonModerate
MiningLow
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0HP14 4SF

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

PL/26/08806/CONDA
Application for approval of details subject to condition 4 (phased risk assessment) of planning approval 21/08339/FUL.
Pending
PL/26/07896/VRC
Variation of condition 16 (approved plans) attached to planning permission PL/25/6328/FA (New self build single storey dwelling to rear of Beverley House with amended access and parking) to allow for the addition of a loft conversion.
Pending
PL/26/08416/FA
Householder application for the construction of a storey side extension, single storey front extension and internal re-arrangements.
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership73.4%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsNone
Lease TypeFreehold
Last Ownership Change2003-05-01
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

18 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£35,937

Population Density-

Owner Occupied91%

Age Distribution

0-15 13%16-64 56%65+ 31%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Naphill and Walters Ash School
0.8 mi
Good
Hughenden Primary School
0.9 mi
Inspected as Hughenden Primary School (URN 110328) on 17 May 2022
The Downley School
1.3 mi
Inspected as The Downley School (URN 131908) on 22 Mar 2022
Pipers Corner School
1.4 mi
Inspected by ISI

3 of 12 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

Oak Cottage Christopher Close
-
£958k
-
Carmen Christopher Close
-
£430k
-
Oak Cottage Christopher Close
-
£525k
-
Rondene Christopher Close
-
£815k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN