23 Richard Beau Nash Apartments, 6–8 Garden Road, Tunbridge Wells, TN1 2XW

UPRN:10008668028Purpose Built Flat2 bedsBuilt before 1900

LeaseholdCouncil Tax: Band CEPC: C (70)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· freshEPC· 5mo agoRisk· 5mo agoCrime· freshConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 1mo ago

23 Richard Beau Nash Apartments, 6–8 Garden Road, Tunbridge Wells, TN1 2XW

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

20 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£324,000

£307k - £340kHigh

Estimate

£324k

Range

£307k – £340k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£1,300

£1k - £1k

Monthly

£1,300

Yield

4.80%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

23 Richard Beau Nash Apartments earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 79/100. Investment score 73/100 reflects strong fundamentals. Crime intensity is moderate. Walkability is excellent (98/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

79/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

73/ 100

High

Crime Score

40/ 100

Elevated

Walkability

98/ 100

Excellent

Transit & Bike

Transit 42Bike 65

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesLead to verifyListing checked 12 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Check before relying on this score: leasehold with no service charge disclosed - the stress test assumes GBP 0. It ranks after every home whose inputs are verified.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM -0.3% (HIGH), sold-comps -14.4%, £/sqft -14.3%] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 14 Nov 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10008668028· as of 14 Nov 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 9 comps, dispersion 24.9%· as of 13 Nov 2026
Rental economics0/40
gross yield 4.8%; range width penalty ×0.82
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1300/mo (range 1150-1400)· as of 14 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -546/mo, -42% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing; leasehold with no service charge disclosed - the stress assumes GBP 0
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 12 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Seller motivationNot scored
no listing-history inputs (first published date, price changes)
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
184 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£244,000£374,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£325,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£1,300/mo

Evidenced range £1,150-£1,400

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £105,050
Net cash flow: -£197/mo
Cash on cash: -2.2%
Score at this price: 15

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.19 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10008668028Valuation edge · as of 14 Nov 2026
property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 9 comps, dispersion 24.9%Valuation edge · as of 13 Nov 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1300/mo (range 1150-1400)Rental economics · as of 14 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 12 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 1300/mo (range 1150-1400)
Stress margin needs verification before you rely on it
costs not disclosed by the advert

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£324,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£1,300

Gross Yield4.80%

1y Growth-

3y Growth+2.9%

5y Growth+2.0%

10y Growth+2.8%

Last Sold Price£200,000 (2012-09-24)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningModerate
LandslideModerate
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0TN1 2XW

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/02507/TCA
Trees CA: Cherry Plum (T008) lift to 4m, prune by 1m. Blue Cypress (T020) fell and grind stump. Sycamore & Goat Willow (T021g) fell and treat stump with eco plugs
Pending
26/02490/TCA
Trees CA: Oak x 2(G003) remove lower dead branches, crown lift to give 3m clearance over field
Pending
26/02471/TPO
TPO: Red Oak (T1) reduce canopy by 2-3m
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership52.1%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining99 yrs
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeLeasehold
Last Ownership Change2012-09-24
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

15 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£35,319

Population Density12,223 /km²

Owner Occupied33%

Age Distribution

0-15 20%16-64 70%65+ 10%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

St James' Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School
0.3 mi
Good
St Barnabas CofE VA Primary School
0.3 mi
Good
The Wells Free School
0.4 mi
-
St Peter's Church of England Primary School
0.5 mi
Area grades2025
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.

6 of 11 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

Richard Beau Nash Apartments, 6 - 8 Garden Road
-
£380k
-
Richard Beau Nash Apartments, 6 - 8 Garden Road
-
£383k
-
Richard Beau Nash Apartments, 6 - 8 Garden Road
-
£265k
-
Richard Beau Nash Apartments, 6 - 8 Garden Road
-
£280k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN