34 Toyse Lane, Burwell, Cambridge, CB25 0DF

UPRN:100090039737-Beds -Built -

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band EEPC: -

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 2mo agoOwnership· 1mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 6mo ago

34 Toyse Lane, Burwell, Cambridge, CB25 0DF

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

16 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£504,000

£454k - £554kMedium

Estimate

£504k

Range

£454k – £554k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

34 Toyse Lane earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 70/100. Investment score 58/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (43/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

70/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

58/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

12/ 100

Low

Walkability

43/ 100

Mixed

Transit & Bike

Transit 35Bike 37

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge-0.6/15
claims [AVM -14.1% (MEDIUM)] → measured edge -0.12pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp; asking more than 10% above the estimate (measured -0.33pp)
Market estimate used (MEDIUM confidence) · snapshot 9 Nov 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100090039737· as of 9 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity12.9/15
176 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 20%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100090039737Valuation edge · as of 9 Nov 2026
listing_factslisting text signals condition works - budget before trusting any yieldRental economics · as of 4 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
listing text signals condition works - budget before trusting any yield

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
3. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£504,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth-0.4%

5y Growth+0.8%

10y Growth+1.1%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningLow
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0CB25 0DF

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/01143/TPO
T1 - Sycamore - Fell to ground level and treat to prevent regrowth - The tree has become very large and is very close to the house the client wishes to remove this and plant a new tree further set back.
Pending
26/01108/TRE
G1 Group of 3 Sycamore and 4 Ash - Reduce heights by 4 -5m, reduce spread on all sides by 3 - 4m to shape round T1 Dying Ash - Fell
Pending
26/01107/TRE
H1 Conifer hedge - Remove to ground level and remove stumps replacing with one Mulberry tree and one Quince tree
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership74.2%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease Type-
Last Ownership Change-
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

15 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£34,311

Population Density-

Owner Occupied83%

Age Distribution

0-15 16%16-64 59%65+ 25%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Burwell Village College (Primary)
0.5 mi
Good
Exning Primary School
2.1 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.
Swaffham Prior Church of England Primary School
2.6 mi
Good
Cambian Dunbroch School
2.8 mi
Good

5 of 13 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

65 Toyse Lane
-
£343k
-
51 Toyse Lane
-
£420k
-
63 Toyse Lane
-
£440k
-
7 Toyse Lane
-
£365k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN