58 Picasso Way, Shoeburyness, Southend-on-Sea, SS3 9XB

UPRN:100090693032Detached PropertyBeds -Built 1976-1982

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band EEPC: C (75)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· freshRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 1mo ago

58 Picasso Way, Shoeburyness, Southend-on-Sea, SS3 9XB

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

18 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£456,000

£410k - £501kMedium

Estimate

£456k

Range

£410k – £501k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£1,950

£2k - £2k

Monthly

£1,950

Yield

4.93%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

58 Picasso Way earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 67/100. Investment score 53/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (27/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

67/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

53/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

9/ 100

Low

Walkability

27/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 11Bike 33

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesListing checked 11 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM -4.2% (MEDIUM)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (MEDIUM confidence) · snapshot 9 Nov 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100090693032· as of 9 Nov 2026
Rental economics0/40
gross yield 4.9%; range width penalty ×0.89
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1950/mo (range 1800-2100)· as of 9 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -701/mo, -36% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 11 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 54 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 11 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity12.8/15
278 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 20%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£356,000£546,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£475,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£1,950/mo

Evidenced range £1,800-£2,100

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £157,550
Net cash flow: -£253/mo
Cash on cash: -1.9%
Score at this price: 13

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.22 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100090693032Valuation edge · as of 9 Nov 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1950/mo (range 1800-2100)Rental economics · as of 9 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 11 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 11 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 1950/mo (range 1800-2100)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 54 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£456,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£1,950

Gross Yield4.93%

1y Growth-

3y Growth+2.1%

5y Growth+1.6%

10y Growth+3.3%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0SS3 9XB

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/01331/FUL
Change of use from light industrial building to flexible use within Classes E(g), B2 and B8 and alter elevations
Pending
26/01313/AMDT
Application to vary condition 10 (car parking) - remove requirement to reinstate the two vehicle crossovers onto Shoebury Avenue (Material Amendment of planning permission 26/00233/AMDT dated 20.07.2026)
Pending
26/00975/FULH
Erect front garage extension, front porch extension and form pitched roof canopy to front, alter front elevation
Conditions

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership76.2%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining144 yrs
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeFreehold
Last Ownership Change-
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

19 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£33,594

Population Density-

Owner Occupied66%

Age Distribution

0-15 17%16-64 57%65+ 26%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Friars Primary School and Nursery
0.3 mi
Inspected as Friars Primary School and Nursery (URN 134704) on 4 Dec 2014
St George's Catholic Primary School
0.6 mi
Good
Great Wakering Primary Academy
0.8 mi
Inspected as Great Wakering Primary School (URN 114792) on 24 Sep 2014
Hinguar Community Primary School
1.0 mi
Inspected as Hinguar Community Primary School (URN 114772) on 8 Jun 2016

5 of 12 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

84 Picasso Way
-
£420k
-
96 Picasso Way
-
£445k
-
92 Picasso Way
-
£225k
-
60 Picasso Way
-
£234k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN