34 Trunch Road, Mundesley, Norwich, NR11 8JX

UPRN:100090880423Detached Bungalow3 bedsBuilt 1967-1975

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band DEPC: D (66)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· 1mo agoEPC· 4mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 1mo ago

34 Trunch Road, Mundesley, Norwich, NR11 8JX

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

today

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

18 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£537,000

£511k - £564kHigh

Estimate

£537k

Range

£511k – £564k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£1,700

£2k - £2k

Monthly

£1,700

Yield

3.74%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

34 Trunch Road earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 70/100. Investment score 65/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (39/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

70/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

65/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

10/ 100

Low

Walkability

39/ 100

Mixed

Transit & Bike

Transit 35Bike 40

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesListing checked 7 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM -1.5% (HIGH)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 9 Nov 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100090880423· as of 9 Nov 2026
Rental economics0/40
gross yield 3.7%; range width penalty ×0.67
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1700/mo (range 1500-1950)· as of 9 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -1,180/mo, -69% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 7 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 5 price cut(s), 500 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 7 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.7/15
228 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£409,000£627,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£545,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£1,700/mo

Evidenced range £1,500-£1,950

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £182,050
Net cash flow: -£662/mo
Cash on cash: -4.4%
Score at this price: 15

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 0.92 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100090880423Valuation edge · as of 9 Nov 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1700/mo (range 1500-1950)Rental economics · as of 9 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 7 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 7 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 1700/mo (range 1500-1950)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 5 price cut(s), 500 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Ask the agent why the price was reduced and whether a previous sale fell through.
5 price cut(s) recorded on the listing history.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£537,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£1,700

Gross Yield3.74%

1y Growth-

3y Growth+0.3%

5y Growth+1.0%

10y Growth+3.4%

Last Sold Price£220,000 (2006-05-26)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseBelow 40 dB

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0NR11 8JX

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

TW/26/2253
Sycamore behind garage (T1) Pollard at 5m, height from 14m to 5m and sides 5m to 1m. Too large for location. Beech (T2) Reduce back to near boundary, side from 3m to 1.5m. To reduce overhang. Sycamore (T3) Reduce side branches hanging over drive by 1m, from 2.5m to 1.5m. To reduce overhang.
Pending
TW/26/2247
Cherry (T1) - Reduce by 1m from 4m to 3m. To maintain tree size for location. Pine (T2) - Fell. Too large for location and is also showing signs of Honey Fungus at base.
Pending
PF/26/2080
Conversion of detached garage to annexe accommodation. External alterations
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership84.3%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeFreehold
Last Ownership Change2006-05-26
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

15 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£28,421

Population Density838 /km²

Owner Occupied74%

Age Distribution

0-15 13%16-64 44%65+ 43%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Mundesley Infant School
0.3 mi
Area grades2024
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.
Mundesley Junior School
0.3 mi
Good
Antingham and Southrepps Primary School
2.9 mi
Good
Bacton Primary School
3.0 mi
Good

0 of 11 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

28 Trunch Road
-
£470k
-
36 Trunch Road
-
£975k
-
42 Trunch Road
-
£385k
-
Trunch Lodge Trunch Road
-
£230k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN