Flat 1, 12 Commercial Street, Maesteg, CF34 9DF

UPRN:100100499412-Beds -Built -

Tenure: -Council Tax: -EPC: -

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoRisk· 2y agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

Flat 1, 12 Commercial Street, Maesteg, CF34 9DF

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

2 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

16 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£75,000

£60k - £90kLow

Estimate

£75k

Range

£60k – £90k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Flat 1 earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 74/100. Investment score 71/100 reflects strong fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)ONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

74/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

71/ 100

High

Crime Score

35/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

No data

Transit & Bike

No data

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires valuation_edge (estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor)

What we could establish

Rental economics24/40
gross yield 8.0% on contractual rent (listing-disclosed tenancy)
- listing_factscontractual rent 1000/mo (tenanted)· as of 6 Nov 2026
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -28/mo, -3% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 6 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity9.2/15
205 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 40%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

listing_factscontractual rent 1000/mo (tenanted)Rental economics · as of 6 Nov 2026
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 6 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Valuation edge could not be scored
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
Seller motivation could not be scored
no listing-history inputs (first published date, price changes)

Property risk deep-dive →flood, subsidence, crime, environment - the full domain

Plan

Before you offer

1. Fill the valuation edge gap before relying on the score.
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
2. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£75,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth+1.3%

5y Growth+3.6%

10y Growth+4.7%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideSignificant
Air QualityLow
NoiseWithheld

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0CF34 9DF

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

P/26/536/FUL
Retrospective application for replacement block retaining walls, demolition of a garage and replaced with new boundary walls and associated works
Pending
P/26/514/NMA
Non material amendment to amend the approved plans listed in condition 1 of P/24/677/FUL
Conditions
P/26/500/FUL
Retention of a tyre shop within the boundary of a car wash
Pending

View Planning Timeline