11 Cedar Crescent, Burnopfield, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE16 6HU

UPRN:100110386772Terrace Property2 bedsBuilt 1900-1929

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band AEPC: D (67)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· freshEPC· 4mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 1mo ago

11 Cedar Crescent, Burnopfield, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE16 6HU

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

today

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

18 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£111,000

£105k - £116kHigh

Estimate

£111k

Range

£105k – £116k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£650

£600 - £700

Monthly

£650

Yield

7.09%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

11 Cedar Crescent earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 73/100. Investment score 60/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (49/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

73/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

60/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

12/ 100

Low

Walkability

49/ 100

Mixed

Transit & Bike

Transit 18Bike 25

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Reduced confidence2 independent sourcesListing checked 11 Nov 2026

Fewer independent sources agree, or a component could not be scored.

Valuation edge2.5/15
claims [AVM +0.9% (HIGH), sold-comps +23.6%, £/sqft +23.6%] → measured edge +0.50pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 10 Nov 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100110386772· as of 10 Nov 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 7 comps, dispersion 18.2%· as of 6 Nov 2026
Rental economics14.9/40
gross yield 7.1%; range width penalty ×0.89
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 650/mo (range 600-700)· as of 10 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -116/mo, -18% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 11 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 1 price cut(s), 495 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 11 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.7/15
260 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£82,500£126,500

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£110,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£650/mo

Evidenced range £600-£700

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £34,300
Net cash flow: £79/mo
Cash on cash: 2.8%
Score at this price: 32

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.75 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100110386772Valuation edge · as of 10 Nov 2026
property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 7 comps, dispersion 18.2%Valuation edge · as of 6 Nov 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 650/mo (range 600-700)Rental economics · as of 10 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 11 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 11 Nov 2026

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is reduced
fewer independent sources agree, or a component could not be scored
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 650/mo (range 600-700)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 1 price cut(s), 495 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Ask the agent why the price was reduced and whether a previous sale fell through.
1 price cut(s) recorded on the listing history.
3. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£111,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£650

Gross Yield7.09%

1y Growth-

3y Growth-3.9%

5y Growth-2.3%

10y Growth+0.8%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideModerate
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0NE16 6HU

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

DM/26/02797/FPA
Two storey front/side extension
Pending
DM/26/02517/TPO
T001 - Beech. 3m crown lift and a 2m crown reduction, removal of deadwood. (No limbs greater than 75mm to be removed). T002 - Sycamore. Crown reduction and remove deadwood. (No branches with a diameter greater than 75mm to be removed). T003 - Beech. Fell to Ground Level. T004 - Elm. Fell to ground level. - TPO - DER-211
Pending
DM/26/02446/FPA
Rear extension, detached garage extension, alterations to the fenestration pattern, timber framed porch to front, rooflights, sun tunnel and solar panels to roof, alterations to access.
Approved

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership69.2%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeFreehold
Last Ownership Change-
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

16 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£29,718

Population Density-

Owner Occupied57%

Age Distribution

0-15 19%16-64 60%65+ 21%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Burnopfield Primary School
0.3 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.
St Joseph's Roman Catholic Voluntary Aided Primary School, Highfield
1.2 mi
Good
Highfield Community Primary School
1.2 mi
Good
Sacred Heart Catholic Primary School, Byermoor
1.4 mi
GoodConcerns

3 of 14 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

21 Cedar Crescent
-
£80k
-
12 Cedar Crescent
-
£106k
-
25 Cedar Crescent
-
£125k
-
30 Cedar Crescent
-
£100k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN