11 Stobart Terrace, Fishburn, Stockton-on-Tees, TS21 4AF

UPRN:100110500077Mid Terrace House3 bedsBuilt 1900-1929

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band AEPC: D (68)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 1mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

11 Stobart Terrace, Fishburn, Stockton-on-Tees, TS21 4AF

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£70,000

£63k - £77kMedium

Estimate

£70k

Range

£63k – £77k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£450

£450 - £500

Monthly

£450

Yield

7.20%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

11 Stobart Terrace earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 68/100. Investment score 54/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is limited (41/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

68/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

54/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

19/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

41/ 100

Mixed

Transit & Bike

Transit 8Bike 30

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence1 independent sourceListing checked 4 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM -7.1% (MEDIUM), sold-comps -15.4%, £/sqft -15.1%] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (MEDIUM confidence) · snapshot 10 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100110500077· as of 10 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 6 comps, dispersion 21.2%· as of 30 Oct 2026
Rental economics17.2/40
gross yield 7.2%; range width penalty ×0.98
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 450/mo (range 450-500)· as of 10 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -116/mo, -26% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 4 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 1 price cut(s), 51 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 4 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity12.8/15
191 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 20%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£56,000£86,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£75,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£450/mo

Evidenced range £450-£500

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £23,800
Net cash flow: £58/mo
Cash on cash: 2.9%
Score at this price: 30

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.78 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100110500077Valuation edge · as of 10 Oct 2026
property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 6 comps, dispersion 21.2%Valuation edge · as of 30 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 450/mo (range 450-500)Rental economics · as of 10 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 4 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 450/mo (range 450-500)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 1 price cut(s), 51 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Ask the agent why the price was reduced and whether a previous sale fell through.
1 price cut(s) recorded on the listing history.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£70,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£450

Gross Yield7.20%

1y Growth-

3y Growth-0.6%

5y Growth+0.9%

10y Growth+3.9%

Last Sold Price£35,000 (2014-08-29)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0TS21 4AF

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

DM/26/01886/NMA
Non-Material Amendment to Planning Permission DM/24/01751/VOC in respect of the scale, layout and appearance of the DNO Substation
Approved
DM/26/01670/FPA
Garage/WC and porch
Approved
DM/26/00948/DRC
Discharge of conditions 7 (part M4(2)) and 8 (landscape maintenance specification) pursuant to DM/23/02842/VOC
Approved

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership83.9%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeFreehold
Last Ownership Change2014-08-29
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

4 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£29,718

Population Density-

Owner Occupied70%

Age Distribution

0-15 15%16-64 66%65+ 19%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Fishburn Primary School
0.4 mi
Inspected as Fishburn Primary School (URN 114095) on 10 Jan 2023
St William's Catholic Primary School
1.1 mi
Good
Bluebell Meadow Primary School
1.2 mi
Good
Sedgefield Hardwick Primary Academy
1.7 mi
-

2 of 14 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

7 Stobart Terrace
-
£50k
-
31 Stobart Terrace
-
£40k
-
40 Stobart Terrace
-
£80k
-
3 Stobart Terrace
-
£80k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN