13 Robins Close, Great Rollright, Chipping Norton, OX7 5RT

UPRN:100120947517Semi-Detached House3 bedsBuilt 1976-1982

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band CEPC: D (62)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· freshEPC· 3mo agoRisk· 5mo agoCrime· freshConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 2mo ago

13 Robins Close, Great Rollright, Chipping Norton, OX7 5RT

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

18 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£328,000

£312k - £345kHigh

Estimate

£328k

Range

£312k – £345k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£1,600

£2k - £2k

Monthly

£1,600

Yield

6.00%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

13 Robins Close earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 67/100. Investment score 67/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (12/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

67/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

67/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

14/ 100

Low

Walkability

12/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 4Bike 18

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence1 independent sourceListing checked 10 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +2.4% (HIGH)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 13 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100120947517· as of 13 Oct 2026
Rental economics20/40
gross yield 7.5% on contractual rent (listing-disclosed tenancy)
- listing_factscontractual rent 2000/mo (tenanted)· as of 10 Nov 2026
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -10/mo, -1% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 10 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 50 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 10 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
250 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivityScores 70+ up to £240,000

£240,000£368,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£320,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£1,600/mo

Evidenced range £1,500-£1,750

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £103,300
Net cash flow: £28/mo
Cash on cash: 0.3%
Score at this price: 35

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.48 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100120947517Valuation edge · as of 13 Oct 2026
listing_factscontractual rent 2000/mo (tenanted)Rental economics · as of 10 Nov 2026
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 10 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 10 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 50 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →flood, subsidence, crime, environment - the full domain

Plan

Before you offer

1. Set your walk-away price before viewing - above £240,000 the deal stops scoring well.
Computed by re-running the score at higher prices.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£328,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£1,600

Gross Yield6.00%

1y Growth-

3y Growth+5.1%

5y Growth+5.2%

10y Growth+4.9%

Last Sold Price£240,000 (2018-09-06)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonModerate
MiningUnknown
LandslideModerate
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0OX7 5RT

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/02459/TCA
There are 2 elder trees in between the trees there's a conifer. The client wishes for all trees to be brought to the height of his Yew hedge to mark a boundary. For the elders this would be a reduction of 30/40%. The conifer would be reduced far more significantly.
Pending
26/02406/TCA
T1 Ailanthus ~ Fell T2 Birch ~ Fell
Pending
26/02176/TCA
3 mature silver birches - remove the low lateral branches and reduce canopy by 10/15% Eucalyptus - crown reduction by 10/15% with more coming off the lateral limbs that protrude out much further than the rest of the canopy.
Approved

View Planning Timeline