Skip to property details

54 Navigators Way, Hedge End, Southampton, SO30 2GP

UPRN:10012197919Purpose Built Flat2 bedsBuilt 2007-2011
Tenure: -Council Tax: Band BEPC: C (80)
Data freshness:Listing· 2mo agoListing: ageing, refreshed 2mo ago (2026-08-28T04:00:03.029973+00:00)Planning· 4mo agoPlanning: stale, refreshed 4mo ago (2026-07-10T09:54:34.682522+00:00)Ownership· freshOwnership: fresh, refreshed 2d ago (2026-11-06T17:25:42.718725+00:00)EPC· 3mo agoEPC: ageing, refreshed 3mo ago (2026-08-21T09:43:12.203098+00:00)Risk· 5mo agoRisk: stale, refreshed 5mo ago (2026-06-18T00:00:00+00:00)Connectivity· 1mo agoConnectivity: ageing, refreshed 1mo ago (2026-10-03T06:43:10.905825+00:00)Schools· 1mo agoSchools: ageing, refreshed 1mo ago (2026-10-06T08:24:30.427161+00:00)Amenities· 2mo agoAmenities: ageing, refreshed 2mo ago (2026-09-23T00:00:00+00:00)Area· Census 2021Area: static reference data (Census 2021); authoritative and does not refresh
54 Navigators Way, Hedge End, Southampton, SO30 2GP

HP Score

Strong
Verdict
2 days ago
  • Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.

    Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence
19 of 21 sources
Sale Estimate
£205,000
£184k - £225kMedium
Estimate
£205k
Range
£184k – £225k
Rent Estimate (pcm)
£1,200
£1k - £1k
Monthly
£1,200
Yield
7.02%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

54 Navigators Way earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 77/100. Investment score 63/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (62/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS
HP Score
77/ 100
Strong
Investment Score
63/ 100
Moderate
Crime Score
12/ 100
Low
Walkability
62/ 100
Moderate
Transit & Bike
Transit 20Bike 57
Walk Score, out of 100

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£205,000
Rent Estimate (pcm)£1,200
Gross Yield7.02%
1y Growth-
3y Growth+0.5%
5y Growth+1.5%
10y Growth+2.9%
Last Sold Price-

Risk Overview

  • Flood RiskUnknown
  • SubsidenceSignificant
  • RadonLow
  • MiningUnknown
  • LandslideLow
  • Air QualityLow
  • NoiseLow

Planning Activity

Recent Apps
0SO30 2GP
Approval Rate
-12mo
Development
low
  • T/26/102332
    1 No. Unspecified (T1) - Reduce overall crown height by approx. 2.5 m, undertaking appropriate target pruning cuts to suitable lateral branches to maintain a balanced and natural crown profile. This is to match the approx. 2m pruning of lateral branches previously carried out overhanging 4 Brunel Close, while also providing adequate clearance from house and reducing tree to a safer, more manageable size. Retain sufficient secondary growth and foliage to preserve structural integrity, physiological function and natural form.
    Pending
  • T/26/102330
    3no. Oak (T1,2 & 3) - Reduce lateral crown overhang extending into rear garden by up to approx. 3.5m, subject to suitable growth points and the natural form of each tree. Max. diameter of any individual pruning wound is not to exceed 75mm. Works are intended to provide a proportionate reduction of lateral encroachment into the garden while retaining the trees’ overall height, character and amenity value. Limitations on pruning wound diameter are intended to minimise the extent of cuts and reduce potential for adverse effects on tree health and condition. Works will be undertaken selectively to maintain natural form and avoid unnecessary or excessive crown reduction.
    Pending
  • T/26/102296
    1no. Oak (T231) - Overall crown reduction of up to 4m. A visual survey identified a compressed fork, with the possibility of internal cracking at the union. Overall crown reduction proposed to reduce the mechanical loading on the fork and help mitigate the potential risk of failure. The works are intended as a preventative measure to retain the tree whilst addressing the identified structural concern. 1no. Oak (T232) - Crown height reduction and reduction of lateral branches extending over 6 Churchward Gardens by up to 3m. A visual survey identified an elongated, overextended crown with a bias towards 6 Churchward Gardens. A reduction in crown height and lateral branches is proposed to reduce crown extension and associated mechanical loading. The works are intended as a preventative measure to manage potential structural risk whilst retaining the tree. All pruning will be undertaken using good Arboricultural practice, with reduction cuts made to suitable growth points and the natural shape and form of each crown maintained.
    Pending

Ownership

  • Corporate Ownership52.9%
  • Overseas OwnershipNo
  • Lease Term Remaining-
  • CovenantsRestrictive
  • Lease Type-
  • Last Ownership Change-
  • SourceLand Registry

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)
7 Mbps
Mobile 4G/5G Coverage
EEThreeO2Vodafone
EV Charger
-
PTAL Rating
-

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£34,474
Population Density-
Owner Occupied76%
Age Distribution
0-15 17%16-64 60%65+ 23%

Schools Nearby

  • Shamblehurst Primary School
    0.3 mi
    Good
  • Berrywood Primary School
    0.3 mi
    Report card2025

    Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.

  • Wildern School
    0.4 mi
    Good
  • Wellstead Primary School
    0.5 mi
    Good

5 of 12 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

Comparables

View All
  • 30 Navigators Way
    -
    £360k
    -
  • 11A Navigators Way
    -
    £370k
    -
  • 4 Navigators Way
    -
    £290k
    -
  • 51 Navigators Way
    -
    £215k
    -