3 Millers View, Bursledon, Southampton, SO31 8JZ

UPRN:10012198714Detached House5 bedsBuilt 2007-2011

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band FEPC: C (78)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· freshEPC· 3mo agoRisk· 5mo agoCrime· freshConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 1mo ago

3 Millers View, Bursledon, Southampton, SO31 8JZ

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

2 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

17 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£742,000

£705k - £779kHigh

Estimate

£742k

Range

£705k – £779k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£3,000

£3k - £3k

Monthly

£3,000

Yield

5.03%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

3 Millers View earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 70/100. Investment score 66/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is moderate. Walkability is limited (60/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

70/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

66/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

43/ 100

Elevated

Walkability

60/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 10Bike 43

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesListing checked 12 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +3.6% (HIGH), sold-comps -2.4%, £/sqft -2.4%] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 9 Nov 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10012198714· as of 9 Nov 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 8 comps, dispersion 24.3%· as of 12 Nov 2026
Rental economics0.2/40
gross yield 5.0%; range width penalty ×0.83
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 3000/mo (range 2700-3250)· as of 9 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -941/mo, -31% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 12 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 73 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 12 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
561 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£536,000£822,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£715,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£3,000/mo

Evidenced range £2,700-£3,250

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £241,550
Net cash flow: -£336/mo
Cash on cash: -1.7%
Score at this price: 15

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.24 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10012198714Valuation edge · as of 9 Nov 2026
property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 8 comps, dispersion 24.3%Valuation edge · as of 12 Nov 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 3000/mo (range 2700-3250)Rental economics · as of 9 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 12 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 12 Nov 2026

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 3000/mo (range 2700-3250)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 73 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£742,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£3,000

Gross Yield5.03%

1y Growth-

3y Growth-0.5%

5y Growth+0.0%

10y Growth+2.1%

Last Sold Price£405,000 (2009-12-08)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0SO31 8JZ

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

T/26/102371
1no. Oak (T3) Age Class M - To crown reduce by a maximum of 1.5m from branch tips, keeping crown at 12m height with a radial spread of 5m. Work is for Health and Safety reasons, the tree is situated in the middle of the church car park. This car park is very busy as there is a lot of activities going on in the building on a daily basis. Also, we recognise that we need to preserve the health of the tree.
Pending
DC/26/102361
Amended discharge of condition 6 (construction management plan - previously approved by DC/22/94220 - to allow an alternative construction route) of X/22/93381 variation planning permission F/17/81809 for construction of link road between St Johns Road and Dodwell Lane (Phase 3 of planning permission O/13/73700).
Pending
F/26/102339
Construction of a detached dwelling and carport
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership63%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeFreehold
Last Ownership Change2009-12-08
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

15 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£34,474

Population Density983 /km²

Owner Occupied68%

Age Distribution

0-15 20%16-64 68%65+ 12%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Bursledon Junior School(CA)
0.5 mi
Good
Bursledon Church of England Infant School
0.6 mi
Good
Hightown Primary School
0.8 mi
Good
Valentine Primary School & Nursery
1.1 mi
Area grades2025
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.

2 of 10 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

4 Millers View
-
£675k
-
7 Millers View
-
£617k
-
6 Millers View
-
£555k
-
5 Millers View
-
£570k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN