2 Gabriel House, 26 Islington Green, London, N1 8DU

UPRN:10012786500Flat/Maisonette1 bedsBuilt 2007 onwards

LeaseholdCouncil Tax: Band EEPC: C (73)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· freshEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 6mo ago

2 Gabriel House, 26 Islington Green, London, N1 8DU

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

today

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

20 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£703,000

£632k - £773kMedium

Estimate

£703k

Range

£632k – £773k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£3,500

£3k - £4k

Monthly

£3,500

Yield

10.50%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

2 Gabriel House earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 80/100. Investment score 71/100 reflects strong fundamentals. Crime intensity is moderate. Walkability is excellent (100/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

80/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

71/ 100

High

Crime Score

38/ 100

Elevated

100

Walkability

100/ 100

Excellent

Transit & Bike

Transit 83Bike 77

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

listing is 'Sold subject to contract' - sale already progressing, not an actionable opportunity

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Economics

What happens to your money

Your assumptions

Purchase price£400,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£3,500/mo

Evidenced range £3,250-£3,800

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £131,300
Net cash flow: £1,073/mo
Cash on cash: 9.8%
Score at this price: -

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 2.59 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion

Property risk deep-dive →flood, subsidence, crime, environment - the full domain

Plan

Before you offer

1. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£703,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£3,500

Gross Yield10.50%

1y Growth-

3y Growth-1.3%

5y Growth-0.6%

10y Growth+0.5%

Last Sold Price£285,000 (2005-07-26)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseHigh

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0N1 8DU

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

P2026/2894/TRE
My client would like to reduce a Sycamore (T1) by removing 4m branch length. Their reason is to maintain it's size in relation to the small garden and space it is growing in.
Pending
P2026/2887/AOD
Approval of Details pursuant to Condition 4 of planning permission Ref:P2024/0549 Dated 21/03/2025
Pending
P2026/2876/TRE
T1 - Norway Maple - Reduce height by up to 2.5 m, side growth by 1-2m., back to living growth points to create a natural crown shape. Remove dead branches. Crown lift by 1m Reasons for work -safety grounds the tree has considerable die back in the upper crown and some signs of decay/structural weakness
Pending

View Planning Timeline