30 Island Apartments, 34 Coleman Fields, London, N1 7BY

UPRN:10012791693Flat/MaisonetteBeds -Built 2003-2006

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band EEPC: C (74)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· freshEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 6mo ago

30 Island Apartments, 34 Coleman Fields, London, N1 7BY

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

18 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£617,000

£555k - £679kMedium

Estimate

£617k

Range

£555k – £679k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£3,100

£3k - £3k

Monthly

£3,100

Yield

6.76%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

30 Island Apartments earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 82/100. Investment score 70/100 reflects strong fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is excellent (93/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

82/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

70/ 100

High

Crime Score

17/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

93/ 100

Excellent

Transit & Bike

Transit 69Bike 81

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

listing is 'Sold subject to contract' - sale already progressing, not an actionable opportunity

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Economics

What happens to your money

Your assumptions

Purchase price£550,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£3,100/mo

Evidenced range £2,850-£3,300

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £183,800
Net cash flow: £290/mo
Cash on cash: 1.9%
Score at this price: -

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.67 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion

Property risk deep-dive →flood, subsidence, crime, environment - the full domain

Plan

Before you offer

1. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£617,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£3,100

Gross Yield6.76%

1y Growth-

3y Growth-1.3%

5y Growth-0.6%

10y Growth+0.5%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0N1 7BY

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

P2026/2926/TRE
Removal of tree in the Rear Garden and replace with semi-mature japanese acer.
Pending
P2026/2907/TRE
T1: Robinia (Robinia pseudoacacia) - Reduce the overall crown height and lateral spread by approximately 2 metres, selectively pruning back to suitable live growth points. Carefully reshape and balance the remaining canopy to achieve a uniform, well-proportioned finish, retaining healthy furnishing growth on all aspects of the crown. Particular care is to be taken to maintain the tree's natural character and established branch structure, avoiding excessive pruning or unnecessary internal thinning. Reason for works: General tree maintenance, allowing more light into the property.
Pending
P2026/2894/TRE
My client would like to reduce a Sycamore (T1) by removing 4m branch length. Their reason is to maintain it's size in relation to the small garden and space it is growing in.
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership43.2%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining229 yrs
CovenantsNone
Lease Type-
Last Ownership Change-
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

10 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£47,411

Population Density-

Owner Occupied17%

Age Distribution

0-15 18%16-64 73%65+ 9%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

City of London Academy Islington
0.2 mi
Inspected as Islington Green School (URN 100454) on 6 Jun 2007
St Mary's CofE Primary School
0.2 mi
Good
Richard Cloudesley School
0.2 mi
Outstanding
Rotherfield Primary School
0.2 mi
Good

3 of 11 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

Island Apartments, 30 Coleman Fields
-
£450k
-
Island Apartments, 30 Coleman Fields
-
£398k
-
Island Apartments, 30 Coleman Fields
-
£550k
-
Island Apartments, 30 Coleman Fields
-
£541k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN