3 The Ransleys, Mill Lane, Challock, Ashford, TN25 4FP

UPRN:10012877501Detached House4 bedsBuilt 2021

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band FEPC: B (85)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

3 The Ransleys, Mill Lane, Challock, Ashford, TN25 4FP

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

3 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

18 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

-- - --

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

3 The Ransleys earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 65/100. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (19/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageHM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

65/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

No data

Crime Score

9/ 100

Low

Walkability

19/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 4Bike 27

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge2.5/15
claims [sold-comps +8.4%, £/sqft +8.4%] → measured edge +0.50pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp; AVM excluded (no market estimate available)
no market estimate available · snapshot 13 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 16.3%· as of 7 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity9/15
225 sales/12mo in area
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 16.3%Valuation edge · as of 7 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Ask the agent why the price was reduced and whether a previous sale fell through.
1 price cut(s) recorded on the listing history.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
4. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate-

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth+2.5%

5y Growth+3.0%

10y Growth+3.7%

Last Sold Price£695,000 (2021-12-17)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonModerate
MiningSignificant
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0TN25 4FP

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

OTH/2026/1891
T1-7-2012 - Norway Maple - Crown reduction of 3-4m, back to a similar height after previous works. Reason - To prevent excessive shading over the property and other plants, as well as stopping the build up of blockages to guttering and drainage. T1-12-2003 - Birch - Crown reduction of 2-3m. Reason - Required for regular maintenance to keep the tree at a manageable size and height as well as preventing excessive shading of the surrounding area.
Pending
PA/2026/1807
Construction of a detached garage and annexe building and new entrance gates - Retrospective
Pending
PA/2026/1790
Proposed erection of detached garage and detached ancillary outbuilding. To include the formation of a secondary vehicular access through the widening of an existing dropped kerb and alterations to the frontage boundary treatment including the replacement of an existing high hedge with a traditional post and rail fence and managed native beech hedge.
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership68.9%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeFreehold
Last Ownership Change2021-12-17
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

19 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£32,991

Population Density75 /km²

Owner Occupied90%

Age Distribution

0-15 19%16-64 59%65+ 22%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Challock Primary School
0.5 mi
Outstanding
Sheldwich Primary School
3.4 mi
Outstanding
Spring Grove School 2003 Ltd
3.5 mi
Inspected by ISI
Towers School and Sixth Form Centre
3.5 mi
Area grades2024
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.

5 of 12 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

The Ransleys Mill Lane
-
£760k
-
The Ransleys Mill Lane
-
£675k
-
The Ransleys Mill Lane
-
£775k
-
The Ransleys Mill Lane
-
£775k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN