3 Manor Road, Stoke Ferry, King's Lynn, PE33 9UG

UPRN:10013007406Semi-Detached House3 bedsBuilt 1996-2002

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band BEPC: E (54)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 6mo ago

3 Manor Road, Stoke Ferry, King's Lynn, PE33 9UG

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

16 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£145,000

£130k - £159kMedium

Estimate

£145k

Range

£130k – £159k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£600

£550 - £650

Monthly

£600

Yield

3.35%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

3 Manor Road earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 63/100. Investment score 57/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (25/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

63/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

57/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

13/ 100

Low

Walkability

25/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 18Bike 34

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesListing checked 3 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge-0.6/15
claims [AVM -48.3% (MEDIUM)] → measured edge -0.12pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp; asking more than 10% above the estimate (measured -0.33pp)
Market estimate used (MEDIUM confidence) · snapshot 13 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10013007406· as of 13 Oct 2026
Rental economics0/40
gross yield 3.3%; range width penalty ×0.87
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 600/mo (range 550-650)· as of 13 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -596/mo, -99% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 3 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 49 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 3 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity12.8/15
146 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 20%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£161,000£247,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£215,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£600/mo

Evidenced range £550-£650

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £67,600
Net cash flow: -£310/mo
Cash on cash: -5.5%
Score at this price: 12

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 0.83 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10013007406Valuation edge · as of 13 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 600/mo (range 550-650)Rental economics · as of 13 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 3 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 3 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 600/mo (range 550-650)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 49 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£145,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£600

Gross Yield3.35%

1y Growth-

3y Growth-1.4%

5y Growth+1.9%

10y Growth+2.8%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningLow
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0PE33 9UG

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/00167/TREECA
TREES IN A CONSERVATION AREA: T1 - White Willow requires repollarding to alleviate weakened, old unions on an already decaying tree approx 5-6 metres . T2 - Cork Screw Willow requires repollarding approx 2-3 metres off to keep its size in keeping with the garden and to stop any chance of failure. G3 - Thuja Plicata hedge requires topping and trimming to restain its hedge aesthetic
Pending
26/00139/TDD
T1 Mature Walnut Tree - Remove tree from middle of the site that has been dead over a year now and is dropping small branches. the larger limbs could well represent a danger if/when winds pick up. A tree surgeon (Treelink) has visited the site and is willing to do the work to mitigate the risk
Approved
26/00139/TREECA
T1 Mature Walnut Tree - Remove tree from middle of the site that has been dead over a year now and is dropping small branches. the larger limbs could well represent a danger if/when winds pick up. A tree surgeon (Treelink) has visited the site and is willing to do the work to mitigate the risk
Approved

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership85%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease Type-
Last Ownership Change-
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

15 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£30,581

Population Density-

Owner Occupied76%

Age Distribution

0-15 16%16-64 57%65+ 27%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

All Saints Academy
0.2 mi
Good
Sheridan House School
3.2 mi
Good
Iceni Secondary Academy
3.7 mi
Area grades2024
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.
Duchy of Lancaster Methwold CofE Primary School
3.9 mi
Area grades2025
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.

3 of 13 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN