17 Lady Bailey Residential Park, Dorchester Hill, Winterborne Whitechurch, Blandford Forum, DT11 0HS

UPRN:10013219396Bungalow Property2 bedsBuilt 1983-1990

Tenure: -Council Tax: -EPC: D (58)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· freshEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

17 Lady Bailey Residential Park, Dorchester Hill, Winterborne Whitechurch, Blandford Forum, DT11 0HS

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

3 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

15 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£167,000

£133k - £200kLow

Estimate

£167k

Range

£133k – £200k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£450

£400 - £500

Monthly

£450

Yield

3.60%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

17 Lady Bailey Residential Park earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 64/100. Investment score 56/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (15/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

64/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

56/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

7/ 100

Low

Walkability

15/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 5Bike 17

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires valuation_edge (estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor)

What we could establish

Rental economics0/40
gross yield 3.6%; range width penalty ×0.76
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 450/mo (range 400-500)· as of 10 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -432/mo, -96% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 4 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity9.2/15
305 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 40%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Economics

What happens to your money

Your assumptions

Purchase price£150,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£450/mo

Evidenced range £400-£500

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £46,800
Net cash flow: -£195/mo
Cash on cash: -5.0%
Score at this price: -

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 0.89 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 450/mo (range 400-500)Rental economics · as of 10 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 4 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Valuation edge could not be scored
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 450/mo (range 400-500)

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Fill the valuation edge gap before relying on the score.
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£167,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£450

Gross Yield3.60%

1y Growth-

3y Growth+1.1%

5y Growth+2.2%

10y Growth+2.8%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningLow
LandslideModerate
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0DT11 0HS

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

P/TRT/2026/06023
T1 - Beech - Remove 2x limb over footpath showing flaring as a result of historical rubbing or squirrel damage. T2 - Beech - Reduce or remove branches to maintain a clearance above footpath of 3m and around BT wire and power line by 1m. Crown reduce by removing branches a maximum of 3m in length. T3 - Beech - Reduce or remove branches to maintain a clearance above footpath of 3m and around BT wire and power line of 1m. Reduce 2 lowest limbs on North side by a maximum of 5m. T4 - Beech - Reduce or remove branches to maintain a clearance above footpath of 3m and around BT wire and power line of 1m. Reduce top by a maximum of 6m. Crown reduce canopy on garden side by reducing branches a maximum of 3m.
Pending
P/TRT/2026/05970
T1 - Beech - Reduce stem closest to no. 7 St Mary’s Close by a maximum of 3m. T2 - Beech - Reduce stem growing towards no. 8 St Mary’s Close by a maximum of 3m. T3 - Beech - Reduce Lowest stem with a co-dominant inclusion by a maximum of 5m. Thin canopy of co-dominant rubbing stem with inclusion in higher canopy by 20%, by reducing branches a maximum of 3m in length. Remove lowest limb with wound growing towards no. 7 St Mary’s Close. T4 - Beech - Fell and replant. T5 - Holly - Reduce canopy on side of no. 4 Purbeck View by a maximum of 2m. T6 - Sycamore - Reduce canopy on stem closest to neighbour's property by 3m. T7 - Sycamore - Reduce canopy of co-dominant stem with historic topping or loss of top by 3m. T8 - Sycamore - Reduce co-dominant stem closest to no. 5 Purbeck View to a height of 3m. T9 - Sycamore - Reduce canopy of co-dominant stem with historic topping or loss of top and canopy over neighbour's property by 3m.
Pending
P/TRT/2026/05205
T2 - Beech - Prune to clear dwelling to give a clearance of 2m from dwelling to nearest foliage. T3 - Beech - Remove lowest branch. T4 - Sycamore - Reduce lowest branch by 2m.
Approved

View Planning Timeline