9 Kingfisher Close, Whitchurch, Tavistock, PL19 9FW

UPRN:10013750641Purpose Built Flat2 bedsBuilt 2007-2011

LeaseholdCouncil Tax: Band BEPC: C (77)

Data freshness:Planning· 4mo agoOwnership· 1mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 1mo ago

9 Kingfisher Close, Whitchurch, Tavistock, PL19 9FW

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

4 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£162,000

£146k - £178kMedium

Estimate

£162k

Range

£146k – £178k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£650

£550 - £700

Monthly

£650

Yield

4.33%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

9 Kingfisher Close earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 62/100. Investment score 61/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is limited (0/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

62/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

61/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

20/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

0/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 15Bike 27

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesListing checked 3 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge-0.6/15
claims [AVM -11.1% (MEDIUM), sold-comps -29.5%, £/sqft -29.8%] → measured edge -0.12pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp; asking more than 10% above the estimate (measured -0.33pp)
Market estimate used (MEDIUM confidence) · snapshot 13 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10013750641· as of 13 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 7 comps, dispersion 21.8%· as of 8 Nov 2026
Rental economics0/40
gross yield 4.3%; range width penalty ×0.74
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 650/mo (range 550-700)· as of 13 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -412/mo, -63% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 3 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 35 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 3 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity12.9/15
184 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 20%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£135,000£207,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£180,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£650/mo

Evidenced range £550-£700

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £56,400
Net cash flow: -£158/mo
Cash on cash: -3.4%
Score at this price: 12

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.07 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10013750641Valuation edge · as of 13 Oct 2026
property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 7 comps, dispersion 21.8%Valuation edge · as of 8 Nov 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 650/mo (range 550-700)Rental economics · as of 13 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 3 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 3 Nov 2026

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 650/mo (range 550-700)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 35 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£162,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£650

Gross Yield4.33%

1y Growth-

3y Growth-2.4%

5y Growth-1.6%

10y Growth+2.5%

Last Sold Price£170,000 (2022-06-30)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonModerate
MiningSignificant
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0PL19 9FW

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

2979/26/TPO
TPO S24 A5 - Oak - Crown thinning of up to 20% - The proposed works aim to improve the management and balance of the canopy, reduce excessive overhanging growth and address potential safety concerns, while preserving the overall health, appearance and long-term future of the oak tree
Pending
2956/26/HHO
Replacement septic tank
Pending
2918/26/TPO
T1: Beech Tree - Reduce tree to standing monolith of 5-6m high, retained for wildlife habitat. Tree is infected with the decay pathogen Ganoderma spp, which in the advanced stages can cause major limb or truck failure. In light of a major limb breaking from this tree and its proximity to the barn, these works are requested. T2: Scots Pine - Remove tree. Tree uses Beech Tree for companion shelter and would be vulnerable to collapse following reduction of Beech Tree.
Pending

View Planning Timeline