96 Hindmarch Crescent, Hedge End, Southampton, SO30 0AP

UPRN:10014222714Flat/MaisonetteBeds -Built -

LeaseholdCouncil Tax: Band BEPC: C (78)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· freshEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoCrime· freshConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 1mo ago

96 Hindmarch Crescent, Hedge End, Southampton, SO30 0AP

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

3 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

20 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£199,000

£189k - £209kHigh

Estimate

£199k

Range

£189k – £209k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£1,150

£1k - £1k

Monthly

£1,150

Yield

6.93%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

96 Hindmarch Crescent earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 72/100. Investment score 62/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is limited (46/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

72/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

62/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

21/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

46/ 100

Mixed

Transit & Bike

Transit 12Bike 46

Walk Score, out of 100

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£199,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£1,150

Gross Yield6.93%

1y Growth-

3y Growth+0.5%

5y Growth+1.5%

10y Growth+2.9%

Last Sold Price£197,000 (2022-10-20)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0SO30 0AP

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

T/26/102429
3no. Leyland Cypress - Remove. Trees are planted close together at the corner of the land. They have not been trimmed for years, and have grown into the native oak and hawthorn trees and both of these are dying off because of it. The cypress trees are non-native and widely known to be detrimental to UK wildlife and habitats. We are keen to plant a native British tree instead, however the soul will be nutrient deplete and very acidic due to the nature of the conifers, so this is best left for a year or two to allow the soil to recover. 1no. Elm - To take no more than 2.5m off the top of the tree to allow more sunlight into the garden. It is shading the conifer and our entire back garden. Stands at just over 10 meters tall.
Pending
DC/26/102361
Amended discharge of condition 6 (construction management plan - previously approved by DC/22/94220 - to allow an alternative construction route) of X/22/93381 variation planning permission F/17/81809 for construction of link road between St Johns Road and Dodwell Lane (Phase 3 of planning permission O/13/73700).
Pending
A/26/102326
Installation of 3.no internally illuminated fascia signs and 2.no internally illuminated projecting/hanging signs
Pending

View Planning Timeline