Alton House, Kingscote, Tetbury, GL8 8XZ

UPRN:10022837837Detached House4 bedsBuilt 1950-1966

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band FEPC: E (53)

Data freshness:Price Paid· freshPlanning· 5mo agoEPC· freshRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

Alton House, Kingscote, Tetbury, GL8 8XZ

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

3 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£947,000

£900k - £994kHigh

Estimate

£947k

Range

£900k – £994k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£3,850

£4k - £4k

Monthly

£3,850

Yield

4.86%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Alton House earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 57/100. Investment score 54/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (0/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

57/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

54/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

7/ 100

Low

Walkability

0/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 6Bike 39

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesListing checked 27 Oct 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM -0.3% (HIGH)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 12 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10022837837· as of 12 Oct 2026
Rental economics0/40
gross yield 4.9%; range width penalty ×0.81
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 3850/mo (range 3500-4250)· as of 12 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -1,308/mo, -34% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 27 Oct 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 140 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 27 Oct 2026
Risk & liquidity14.7/15
141 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£712,500£1,092,500

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£950,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£3,850/mo

Evidenced range £3,500-£4,250

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £325,050
Net cash flow: -£541/mo
Cash on cash: -2.0%
Score at this price: 15

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.20 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10022837837Valuation edge · as of 12 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 3850/mo (range 3500-4250)Rental economics · as of 12 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 27 Oct 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 27 Oct 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 3850/mo (range 3500-4250)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 140 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£947,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£3,850

Gross Yield4.86%

1y Growth-

3y Growth+0.0%

5y Growth+0.5%

10y Growth+2.5%

Last Sold Price£380,000 (2019-07-29)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonModerate
MiningUnknown
LandslideSignificant
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0GL8 8XZ

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/03305/TCONR
There are three mature hazel bushes (Nos 1, 2,3,) and a young oak tree (No 4) planted in about 2003 which require a modest crown reduction to avoid them interfering with, or damaging, overhead power cables. The proposed work will involve reducing the height of the crown by about one metre on each tree. There is also a pussy willow (No 5) which risks damaging an overhead telecommunications cable as well as an overhead power line. The proposed work involves pollarding the crown to reduce the height to the level when it was last pruned.
Pending
26/03129/AGFO
Prior notification for erection of agricultural building for the storage of machinery and fodder
Pending
26/02568/TCONR
T1 - Silver Birch tree to be crown reduced by approx 30%
Approved

View Planning Timeline