8 Thomas Rider Way, Boughton Monchelsea, Maidstone, ME17 4GA

UPRN:10022901087End Terrace House3 bedsBuilt 2003-2006

FreeholdCouncil Tax: -EPC: C (79)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· 1mo agoEPC· 3mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

8 Thomas Rider Way, Boughton Monchelsea, Maidstone, ME17 4GA

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

today

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

20 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£369,000

£350k - £387kHigh

Estimate

£369k

Range

£350k – £387k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£1,650

£2k - £2k

Monthly

£1,650

Yield

5.82%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

8 Thomas Rider Way earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 68/100. Investment score 61/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is limited (35/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

68/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

61/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

20/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

35/ 100

Mixed

Transit & Bike

Transit 7Bike 35

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesListing checked 4 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +7.9% (HIGH), sold-comps -7.6%, £/sqft -7.7%] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 9 Nov 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10022901087· as of 9 Nov 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 16%· as of 22 Oct 2026
Rental economics5.9/40
gross yield 5.8%; range width penalty ×0.90
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1650/mo (range 1550-1800)· as of 9 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -352/mo, -21% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 4 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 47 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 4 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
305 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£255,000£391,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£340,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£1,650/mo

Evidenced range £1,550-£1,800

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £110,300
Net cash flow: -£5/mo
Cash on cash: -0.1%
Score at this price: 20

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.44 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10022901087Valuation edge · as of 9 Nov 2026
property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 16%Valuation edge · as of 22 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1650/mo (range 1550-1800)Rental economics · as of 9 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 4 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 1650/mo (range 1550-1800)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 47 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£369,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£1,650

Gross Yield5.82%

1y Growth+2.9%

3y Growth-2.1%

5y Growth+0.3%

10y Growth+2.6%

Last Sold Price£278,000 (2016-10-21)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningLow
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0ME17 4GA

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/503840/TPOA
TPO Application to Reduce crown of T2- Oak tree from touching the building. Team to cut back 2ms from the building, subject to TPO No. 10 of 1994.
Pending
26/504087/LAWPRO
Lawful Development Certificate for proposed external alterations including replacement of front and rear uPVC shiplap cladding with matching brickwork, new front window, infilling rear doorway with matching brickwork, and replacement of hanging tiles with squareprofile tiles retaining colour.
Pending
26/503614/TPOA
Tree Preservation Order application: Oak tree - cut back the overhanging branches by 1-2m. Current spread is approximately 6m
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership74.9%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeFreehold
Last Ownership Change2016-10-21
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

2 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£34,151

Population Density4,696 /km²

Owner Occupied69%

Age Distribution

0-15 24%16-64 62%65+ 14%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Leigh Academy Tree Tops
0.4 mi
Inspected as Bell Wood Community Primary School (URN 134738) on 22 Feb 2012
The Holy Family Catholic Primary School
0.4 mi
Good
Leigh Academy Molehill
0.7 mi
Area grades2024
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.
Leigh Academy Langley Park
0.8 mi
-

5 of 12 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

28 Thomas Rider Way
-
£430k
-
7 Thomas Rider Way
-
£330k
-
16 Thomas Rider Way
-
£363k
-
24 Thomas Rider Way
-
£360k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN